Center for Judicial Engagement
![]() |
|
| Download: Government Unchecked |
The courts were meant to be an integral part of keeping legislators and executive branch officials within the proper bounds of their authority. But as the Institute for Justice has seen too often, judges are either unwilling or feel unable to enforce constitutional limits on the size and scope of government power.
Changing that is the mission of IJ’s Center for Judicial Engagement. The Constitution was designed to be a bulwark of liberty against overreaching government, but it can only serve that vital function when judges actually enforce it. Increasingly, however, courts are inclined to disregard constitutional limits on government power under the rubric of judicial minimalism or restraint, when often a more accurate term would be “judicial abdication.” That must change. The Center for Judicial Engagement will cut through unhelpful rhetoric about supposed judicial activism and simply ask whether judges are properly engaged in their role of interpreting and applying the Constitution.
Simply put, Americans need judges who will judge. By changing the way we think about and talk about the role of judges in our system of government, the Center for Judicial Engagement seeks to restore the Constitution and our courts to their proper role: limiting government, not rationalizing its heedless expansion at the whim of politicians.
For more on the Center’s animating principles, see its Declaration.
Also, please see the Center’s empirical studies and legal scholarship about the need for judicial engagement and the too-often devastating effects of judicial abdication.
For up-to-the-moment news, make sure to bookmark the News and Videos & Podcasts pages.
- American Judges Must Bench Their Rule-Of-Law Sapping Empathy
Chip Mellor August 4, 2011 Forbes.com Whenever a president nominates...
... more- Civil Forfeiture Laws And The Continued Assault On Private Property
Chip Mellor June 8, 2011 Forbes.com Civil forfeiture laws represent one..
... more- A Child's Right to Sell Lemonade
Jason Orr July 1, 2011 Washington Post A group of Maryland children recently...
... more- An Intelligible Principle To Restrain Unelected Government Officials
Chip Mellor May 16, 2011 Forbes.com By now it is no secret that the massive new laws regulating
... more- Deferring to the Constitution
Anthony Sanders February 11, 2011 Townhall.com Why does the Constitution place restrictions on Congress?
... more- Cancer Patients vs. the Attorney General
Bob McNamara February 14, 2011 Huffington Post I don't meet a lot of kids in my line of work.
... more- Buzzing By The Constitution
Chip Mellor April 19, 2011 Forbes.com During a recent argument before the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan sought to minimize the importance of an attorney's statement with which she disagreed by saying "some people may use certain buzz words and other people don't use those buzz words
... more



