Will the Supreme Court Limit Police Power to “Stop and Frisk”?
Podcast (deep-dive): Play in new window | Download
One of the most controversial practices in modern policing is law enforcement’s power to “stop and frisk” individuals without probable cause that a crime has been committed. On today’s show, we talk about the origins of this practice, the court rulings that normalized and expanded it, and the need–and opportunity–for the U.S. Supreme Court to scale it back.
Recent Episodes
These Inspectors Think “Open for Business” Means “No Warrant Required”
In Ohio, wildlife inspectors think that the law gives them permission to come into private businesses without permission—no probable cause or warrant required
Read MoreWhen Can Your Past Bar You From a Job—And When Should It?
In Virginia, any one of 176 so-called barrier crimes can disqualify a person from work in certain occupations for life—no matter how old the conviction, how unrelated it is to the work the person desires to do, or how little it reflects the person’s fitness today. These laws kept IJ client Rudy Carey from fulfilling work as a substance abuse counselor for people he is uniquely fit to help. In today’s show, we talk about what happened to Rudy and how he is fighting against collateral consequences laws that are irrational and unjust.
Read MoreGrand Theft Auto in Wilmington, Delaware
How One City Cashes in on a Towing and Impound Racket
In Wilmington, Delaware, any car with more than $200 in outstanding fines can be towed by private towing companies. Vehicle owners have no way to […]
Read MoreIJ at 30: IJ President Scott Bullock on the Cases and Clients that Changed IJ and the Law (A Deep Dive Best Of)
IJ President Scott Bullock on the Cases and Clients that Changed IJ and the Law (A Deep Dive Best Of)
Before he was IJ’s president, Scott Bullock spent 25 years as an IJ attorney. In this episode, he recounts his years in the trenches as […]
Read More