New Jersey


Law Grade
State Law Evasion Grade  Final
New Jersey


Forfeiture Law
New Jersey civil forfeiture laws offer scant protection to property owners.  The government only needs to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the seized property is related to criminal activity.  Once shown, the owner bears the burden of proving that the property was not forfeitable, making him guilty until proven innocent.  The property owner must show that he was not aware of the criminal activity, was not involved with the criminal activity and took all reasonable steps to prevent the criminal activity.  Law enforcement keeps 100 percent of the funds forfeited, creating an incentive to pursue forfeiture over other law enforcement efforts.  Moreover, New Jersey officials are not required to track and report forfeitures and proceeds.A New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled that the forfeiture regime violated constitutional due process because of the profit incentive imbedded in it.[1]  Unfortunately, the appellate division overruled the district judge and reinstated the incentive provision.[2]

1  See: Bullock, S. (2003). Court seizes the day: New Jersey civil forfeiture laws declared unconstitutional. Retrieved September 25, 2009, from

2 State v. One 1990 Ford Thunderbird, 852 A.2d 1114 (2004).


Forfeitures as Reported to LEMAS (Drug-related only)


Total Assets

Assets Forfeited per
Law Enforcement Agency














Equitable Sharing Proceeds from the Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF)


Proceeds Returned to State

FY 2000


FY 2001


FY 2002


FY 2003


FY 2004


FY 2005


FY 2006


FY 2007


FY 2008




Average per Year



Freedom of Information Data
No Data Available; Not Required to Collect


Learn how states were graded and how data was collected

Return to Policing for Profit main page