President and General Counsel
Grades |
State Law Evasion Grade | Final Grade |
|
North Dakota
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Forfeiture Law![]() |
North Dakota provides better protections for property owners against civil forfeiture abuse than many states. To forfeit property, the government only needs to demonstrate that there is probable cause to bring the forfeiture action and establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the property is related to criminal activity. The burden is on the property owner to prove his innocence and establish that the property is not subject to forfeiture, effectively making owners guilty until proven innocent. But the state does offer some important protections. Under North Dakota law, residences and other real estate are not subject to forfeiture if they are co-owned by someone who has not been convicted of the underlying criminal offense.[1] Additionally, none of the proceeds from civil forfeiture flow to law enforcement in North Dakota.
1 N.D. Cent. Code § 29-31.1-01; see also CCIM Institute. (2006, July 6). Civil asset forfeiture. Retrieved September 25, 2009, from http://www.ccim.com/system/files/Civil_Asset_Forfeiture_0.pdf. |
Forfeitures as Reported to LEMAS (Drug-related only)![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
Equitable Sharing Proceeds from the Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF) ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Freedom of Information Data![]() |
No Data Available; Not Required to Collect
|
Arlington, Va.—It’s called policing for profit and it’s happening all across America. But according to a new study released today, residents of North Dakota have less to worry about than residents of most states. Under a practice called “civil forfeiture,” police and prosecutors’ offices seize private property—often without ever charging the owners with a crime,…
Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
© Institute for Justice 2021
IJ® is a registered trademark of the Institute for Justice.
Privacy Policy
Last modified: January 1, 2020