fbpx

CASE ENTRY

Floyd v. Vannoy

Low-IQ drifter confesses to killing two gay men three days apart in 1980. He’s convicted of first murder, acquitted of the second. Decades later, DNA exculpates him of the second murder, but DNA from the first no longer exists. Fifth Circuit: New trial. Evidence of innocence, like a third party’s fingerprints at the scene (which was withheld from the defense) and a detective’s propensity for beating suspects, is ample. Dissent: A finding that a convict is actually innocent isn’t enough to grant him relief; he still has to prove that his rights were violated and that deference to the state court is out of line.


Tags: 2018, Brady Rights, Brady Violation, Evidence, Fifth Circuit, Professional Responsibility

Sign up to receive IJ's biweekly digital magazine, Liberty & Law along with breaking updates about our fight to protect the rights of all Americans.

JOIN THE FIGHT!