fbpx

CASE ENTRY

Stinnie v. Holcomb

Allegation: Virginia law traps low-income motorists in a catch-22; failure to pay court fees automatically results in the suspension of one’s driver’s license, which frustrates plaintiffs’ efforts to earn the money necessary to pay the fees. (Study: One in six Virginia drivers has a suspended license thanks, in part, to court debt.) District court: The suit is barred on several procedural grounds, including the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Fourth Circuit: None of which are appealable. Maybe amend the complaint? Dissent: The suit should not have been dismissed. (IJ amicus: Federal courts undermine constitutional rights by their overly aggressive application of Rooker-Feldman.)


Tags: 2018, Due Process, Equal Protection, Fourth Circuit

Sign up to receive IJ's biweekly digital magazine, Liberty & Law along with breaking updates about our fight to protect the rights of all Americans.

JOIN THE FIGHT!