March 13, 2017

Mississippi Governor Signs Civil Forfeiture Reform

A view of the Mississippi State Capitol in Jackson. In the foreground stands a replica of the Liberty Bell. Designed by Theodore C. Link and completed in 1903, the Beaux-Arts structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
A view of the Mississippi State Capitol in Jackson. In the foreground stands a replica of the Liberty Bell. Designed by Theodore C. Link and completed in 1903, the Beaux-Arts structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed a bill earlier today that will add new transparency requirements to civil forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to confiscate property without filing criminal charges.

“Today’s signature is a welcome first step to shining a light on civil forfeiture in Mississippi,” said Institute for Justice Legislative Counsel Lee McGrath. “HB 812 will hopefully inform the public about how often law enforcement seizes and forfeits property.”

Under the bill, HB 812, whenever a law enforcement agency seizes property, it must provide a description of the property and its value, as well as the name of the seizing agency, and copies of any petition that contest the forfeiture. That information will then be posted on a public searchable website, which would be created and maintained by the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics. Grants would be withheld from noncompliant agencies.

In addition, HB 812 would require agencies to obtain a seizure warrant within 72 hours of seizure and oblige agencies to request prosecuting forfeiture within 30 days of seizure. However, the new law does not require agencies to account for their forfeiture fund spending.

“Mississippi’s failure to account for spending from forfeiture funds is particularly troubling,” said Jennifer McDonald, an IJ research analyst. “With forfeiture, law enforcement agencies can keep some or all of the proceeds from the property they take. This enables them to generate and spend funds outside the normal appropriations process, which undermines the legislature’s power of the purse. At a bare minimum, agencies should have to publicly report how they spend forfeiture proceeds.”

In January, the Institute for Justice published Forfeiture Transparency & Accountability: State-by-State and Federal Report Cards, which grades all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. departments of Justice and the Treasury on six basic elements of transparency and accountability in their forfeiture programs. Since Mississippi did not require forfeiture reporting before HB 812, it earned failing grades across the board.

Mississippi is just the latest state to take on civil forfeiture. Since 2014, 18 other states and Washington, D.C. have passed reforms, ranging from increased transparency to outright abolishing civil forfeiture.

Share

More on Private Property

Joe Marino stands with arms crossed in front of white fence and cornfield at his family's New Jersey home

Private Property

Former Attorneys General, Business Associations, and Former Department of Labor Leaders Support Family Farm’s Supreme Court Case

Andrew Wimer · August 5, 2026

Giant Skeletons in South Milwaukee yard

Private Property

South Milwaukee Orders Residents to Take Down Whimsical Skeleton Display, a Violation of Their First Amendment Rights

Christopher Ingraham · July 7, 2026

Leonard Hoffmann is a North Dakota property owner fighting for fair compensation for property taken by a pipeline company through eminent domain.

Private Property

Ranchers’ Fight for a Fair Price from Pipeline Company that Took Their Land Heads to the US Supreme Court

Andrew Wimer · June 29, 2026