Anti-Circumvention Forfeiture Act

Under civil forfeiture, the state can permanently confiscate your cash, car, and other property—without a prosecutor convicting or even charging you with a crime. Although some states have acted to protect innocent property owners, a loophole still puts owners at risk. 

By participating in a federal forfeiture program known as “equitable sharing,” state and local agencies can outsource forfeiture litigation to the federal government—thus circumventing state law—and receive up to 80 percent of the proceeds from forfeited property. 

According to a report by the Institute for Justice, Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture, “since 2000, the federal government has distributed more than $10.3 billion in equitable sharing proceeds to state and local law enforcement agencies nationwide, about $8 billion from the Department of Justice and $2.3 billion from the Department of the Treasury” (pg. 182).  

The Institute for Justice has drafted model anti-circumvention legislation for state legislators to protect property owners from this abusive program. Under this model, no county, municipal or state agency, or intergovernmental task force can transfer seized property to the federal government unless the seized property includes U.S. currency valued at over $50,000. 

According to the Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture at the Department of the Treasury , “It is our view that the greatest damage to criminal enterprises can be achieved through large forfeitures” that are “high-impact, i.e., cash forfeitures equal to or greater than $100,000.” 

Importantly, this legislation does not change the authority of police, sheriffs, and highway patrols to collaborate with the federal government to seize contraband and related property. Instead, it protects the power of state legislatures to ensure that most forfeiture cases will be litigated under state law. 

So far, Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that limit their agencies from participating in the federal government’s equitable sharing program.