February 1, 2012

IJ Earns Twofold Victory In California

Carlos Barragan, right, is now free to train and inspire National City, Calif., youth at his boxing gym and mentoring center without the government threatening eminent domain.  His case recently sparked another court victory, this one for open meetings in California.
Carlos Barragan, right, is now free to train and inspire National City, Calif., youth at his boxing gym and mentoring center without the government threatening eminent domain.  His case recently sparked another court victory, this one for open meetings in California.

By William R. Maurer

Call it a twofold win that will both advance government transparency and help fight eminent domain abuse.

On November 10, 2011, the San Diego Superior Court issued an order temporarily enjoining National City from using changes to its main land-use documents as the basis for a finding of blight.  The changes to the documents—and the ability to use them to justify a new blight designation—could have had devastating effects on the Institute for Justice’s client, the Community Youth Athletic Center (CYAC).

After IJ and CYAC prevailed against National City in its efforts to renew its blight designation in order to facilitate the condemnation and transfer of CYAC’s gym to private developers, National City passed significant—and potentially destructive—changes to its documents governing land use.  These changes could have generated a new blight designation and another effort to take CYAC’s property.

IJ quickly identified a major problem with what the local government was trying to do:  National City’s Planning Commission had failed to comply with California’s open public meetings law.  That law requires the city to issue an agenda prior to the hearing listing the documents on which the commission would vote; the commission’s agenda instead described all ten documents in one meaningless catch-all phrase.  CYAC and IJ sued to force the city to start the entire process over.

Soon after the court issued the injunction, the city capitulated and decided to re-notice and re-hold the hearing.  In the meantime, the California Supreme Court issued a decision upholding California’s new law abolishing redevelopment agencies, thus sparing CYAC from new threats of eminent domain abuse.

IJ’s tenacity and its willingness to follow up its victories helped CYAC win yet another round in its fight against National City.  And we’ll continue fighting until this inspiring gym that helps keep at-risk kids off the street is safe from the wrecking ball once and for all.

William R. Maurer is executive director of the IJ Washington Chapter.

Share

Related Case

Community Youth Athletic Center co-founder and IJ client Clemente Casillas at the CYAC gym in National City, Calif.

Knocking Out Eminent Domain Abuse: Youth Gym Files Suit Against National City, Calif.

After decades of keeping two-thirds of the city under a bogus “blight” designation, National City, Calif., applied to renew the blight label to prevent it from expiring. That renewal would have reauthorized the city to abuse eminent domain against the nearly 700 properties in the designated area, including a gym for at-risk youth.

Also in this Issue

IJ client Akiim DeShay seeks a bone marrow donor match, but a federal law has hampered that search. Thanks to a recent federal appeals court victory by IJ, a pilot program designed to attract more bone marrow donors may now start moving forward.

Liberty & Law

Life-saving Win

February 1, 2012

Thanks to the trial court's ruling, IJ clients Monica Poindexter (left) and Heather Coffy (right) can continue to pick the schools that best suit their children’s educational needs.

Liberty & Law

School Choice Wins Again in Indiana

February 1, 2012

IJ clients, from left, Kim Sjostrom, Brad Sonnentag, and Robert and Rebecca McCaughtry have steadfastly sought the right to challenge the constitutionality of the Red Wing, Minn., rental home inspection law. Thanks to IJ’s recent Minnesota Supreme Court victory, their constitutional challenge will move forward.

Liberty & Law

Minnesota Supreme Court Ruling Advances Property Owners’ and Renters’ Challenge to Unconstitutional Inspection Scheme

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

Licensed to Speak?

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

Charge to Freedom!

February 1, 2012

Dina Galassini (above) and friends protesting a bond issue in Fountain Hills, Ariz.

Liberty & Law

Stifling Citizen Speech In Arizona

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

Know a student who wants to change the world?

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

Can the Government Arbitrarily Restrict Property Rights?

February 1, 2012

IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship client Kenneth Coats personifies the entrepreneurial ambition found in inner-cities across the United States. The IJ Clinic has helped Coats create businesses that help others get to work.

Liberty & Law

IJ Clinic Entrepreneur Succeeds Despite Government Interference

February 1, 2012

Expanding Choice report cover

Liberty & Law

New Reports Counter School Choice Opponents’ Myths with Facts

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

Dentists vs. Smiles

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

IJ Arizona Chapter Celebrates Tenth Anniversary

February 1, 2012

Liberty & Law

IJ Accepting 2012 Law Student Conference Applications

February 1, 2012

Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!

Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.