Will the Supreme Court Finally Curb Civil Forfeiture? Maybe.
Podcast (deep-dive): Play in new window | Download
As our listeners probably know, civil forfeiture is legal practice that lets the government take and keep your property by claiming it’s connected to a crime, without needing to convict anyone. You can lose your property even when the government agrees you’re innocent.
Recently, the Supreme Court decided an important forfeiture case. While the outcome was disappointing, the way they decided it gives us hope that the high court is finally ready to rein in this form of theft-by-government.
Today we chat with IJ attorneys Dan Alban and Kirby Thomas-West to discuss Culley v. Marshall and what it means for the fight against civil forfeiture.
Recent Episodes
IJ's NEW STUDY: Who Pays When SWAT Wrecks Your House?
If police destroyed your home while chasing a fugitive, would the government pay for the damage? All too often, the answer is no. A first-of-its-kind national study from […]
Listen NowLawyers are a MONOPOLY. We're breaking it.
Millions of Americans face serious legal problems every year without a lawyer—often because the legal system has made help too expensive and too hard to […]
Listen NowCity Sinks Backyard Swim Lessons for Special Needs Kids
Teaching kids to swim in a backyard pool is an American tradition, but one South Carolina city has now banned backyard swim lessons. Libby Souder […]
Listen NowA Rancher, a Family Farm, and 3 Supreme Court Showdowns
We are headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court with three cases in the next term. Today, we’re discussing two of those cases, which could […]
Listen Now