Project on Immunity and Accountability
IJ combats legal doctrines that stand in the way of meaningful accountability for government mistakes and misconduct.
Project on Immunity and Accountability
Our mission is to ensure that every right guaranteed by the Constitution has a remedy in an American court.
Too often, when a government official violates someone’s constitutional rights, there is no way to hold the official accountable. Even if nobody seriously disputes that the official did something wrong, an array of immunities and other legal doctrines can make it impossible to sue—leaving individuals without recourse and officials free from the kind of accountability that prevents violations from happening again.
The Institute for Justice is the national leader in challenging these doctrines. In 2020, IJ launched the Project on Immunity and Accountability, and since then IJ has taken on cases involving the inability to sue federal officials, qualified immunity, prosecutorial immunity, judicial immunity, and other legal barriers to suit.
These immunities and other doctrines can stand in the way of accountability even when government officials intentionally violate the law or make obvious and preventable mistakes. IJ has taken on multiple cases where government SWAT teams raided the wrong house or detained a wrong person, including one wrong-house raid case, Martin v. United States, which IJ took all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Lower courts dismissed the case, but the Supreme Court allowed it to proceed. IJ has also taken on cases where officers held people at gunpoint or kept them in jail for days without providing any of the basic due process protections.
A key part of IJ’s work in this area also involves accountability for official misconduct. Even where constitutional violations are obvious and largely undisputed, legal doctrines can stand in the way of accountability. We have fought for meaningful remedies in cases involving abuses by law enforcement, prosecutors misusing their power to bring unfounded criminal charges, and judicial officers tainted by obvious conflicts of interest.
When private parties violate the law, we trust the courts to provide a remedy. The same should be true when government officials violate the Constitution.
Litigation
The Project on Immunity and Accountability is the only public-interest project focused exclusively on clearing immunity doctrines and other barriers to accountability.
IJ attorneys are nationally recognized experts in handling cases that involve immunity and accountability issues, such as:
The project formally launched in January 2020. Since then, five of our cases have gone before the U.S. Supreme Court: Brownback v. King, Devillier v. Texas, Gonzalez v. Trevino, Murphy v. Schmitt, and Martin v. United States. More are on the horizon.
We litigate cases across the United States, including dozens of active cases:
We Tell Our Clients’ Stories at the Supreme Court.

FBI agents raided the wrong home in suburban Atlanta. Now the federal government refuses to compensate the victims even though Congress passed a law permitting suits for damages caused by federal employees.
Martin v. United States was argued at the United States Supreme Court on April 29th, 2025.
Our Supreme Court Cases
Immunity and Accountability | Private Property
DeVillier v. Texas
Victory! In April 2024, the Supreme Court vacated the Fifth Circuit decision and ruled the DeVillier family can sue Texas for flooding caused by the state. Richie DeVillier lives on the same patch of Texas land where his father was born. His cattle ranch outside of Houston has been in his family since his great-grandfather—“Skunk” DeVillier—homesteaded the land back…
Read moreWe Win “Unwinnable” Cases.
Rosales v. Bradshaw
Mario Rosales was held at gunpoint by an off-duty sheriff’s deputy even though he had done nothing wrong. Still, a court granted the officer qualified immunity and dismissed Mario’s civil rights lawsuit.
Bailey v. Iles
Waylon Bailey was arrested after making a joke about his local sheriff’s office. His First Amendment lawsuit was dismissed after the deputies were granted qualified immunity.
Gibson v. Goldston
The Institute for Justice (IJ) teamed up with a West Virginia man whose rights were violated by a Raleigh County family court judge. IJ and Matthew Gibson are urging the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a lower court’s ruling that Judge Louise Goldston was not entitled to judicial immunity after she abruptly halted a court hearing, ordered everyone present to go to Matthew’s house, searched through his belongings without a warrant, and threatened to arrest him when he began recording the encounter.
amicus briefs
We guide courts with amicus briefs, and they take notice.
Education
Research & Studies
Immunity and Accountability
Unaccountable
The largest ever study of qualified immunity cases, Unaccountable finds the doctrine shields a wider array of officials and conduct than commonly thought while unacceptably burdening victims of government abuse and failing at its goals.
Immunity and Accountability
Constitutional GPA
Constitutional rights only exist if they can be enforced. But a confusing patchwork of immunity doctrines and special rules often means they cannot be. Chief among the doctrines that prevent constitutional accountability is qualified immunity,…
Media
Bound by Oath Season 2
Join our team as we look at the history of why it’s so difficult to hold government officials accountable when they violate the Constitution.
Intelligence Squared debate: Liptak, Bidwell, Malcolm
Listen to PIA co-director Anya Bidwell debate the importance of abolishing qualified immunity.
Americans Against Qualified Immunity
We are a grassroots movement of Americans from all walks of life working to ensure that if we must follow the law, then government workers must follow the Constitution.

Frequently Asked Questions About Ending Qualified Immunity
What is Qualified Immunity? How Does It Work? Read the Most Frequently Asked Questions about Qualified Immunity.
project team
Project on Immunity and Accountability Cases
Immunity and Accountability | Rule of Law
Chicago Homeowner Sues After Warrantless Raid by Federal Agents
When federal agents ransack an innocent homeowner’s private property without a warrant, it’s a clear violation of the Constitution, and there must be a way to hold them accountable.
Immunity and Accountability | Rule of Law
Long Island Man Fights for His Day in Court
An experienced electrician was badly shocked due to a government employee's mistake. Now, he's fighting for his day in court.
Immunity and Accountability | Rule of Law
Atlanta Woman Sues Officers, U.S. Government for Wrongly Raiding Her Home in Search of Man Already in Jail
More than a dozen heavily armed law enforcement officers stormed Cathy George's apartment, looking for a fugitive who had no connection to Cathy and who was already in custody.
4th Amendment Project | Immunity and Accountability | Rule of Law
Portland Family Files Lawsuit After SWAT Team Arrested Innocent 16-Year-Old at Gunpoint
Parents sue after a SWAT team detained their innocent 16-year-old son at gunpoint as he walked to lunch.
Immunity and Accountability | Rule of Law
Dallas Bar Owner Asks Supreme Court to Let His Suit Over Bogus Prosecution Move Forward
A Dallas bar owner asks the Supreme Court to deny immunity to the police detective who led a bogus investigation against him.
Project on Immunity and Accountability News
Victory! Court Rejects Qualified Immunity in Louisiana Motorists’ Case, Allowing Fourth Amendment Claims of an Unconstitutional Traffic Stop to Continue
NEW OLREANS—For nearly four years, Mario Rosales and Gracie Lasyone have pursued justice over an unconstitutional traffic stop and roadside questioning by two Alexandria, Louisiana, police officers. Last year, Mario and…
Federal Court Orders DHS to Stop Detaining People with Valid Identification and Halts Warrantless Construction Site Raids
MOBILE, Ala.—A federal judge in Alabama ordered immigration officers to stop warrantless raids of construction sites, to stop detaining construction workers without a reason to suspect that a specific individual…
US Citizen and Construction Worker Wins First Round in His Lawsuit Over Repeated Unconstitutional Detentions
MOBILE, Ala.—A judge in Alabama granted Leo Garcia Venegas, an American citizen and construction worker, a first-round victory in his federal lawsuit aimed at stopping unconstitutional raids and detentions by immigration officers. Judge…
Court Rules North Carolina Family’s Lawsuit Can Move Forward After SWAT Team Raided, Damaged Wrong Home
WILMINGTON, N.C.—On Thursday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina denied qualified immunity for officers who raided an innocent family’s Pender County home in April 2024.
Chicago Homeowner Sues Federal Government After Warrantless Raid by Immigration Agents
CHICAGO—Today, a Chicago homeowner filed a lawsuit against the federal government over a warrantless raid of his property by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents last October. The lawsuit, filed by Leo Feler and his attorneys from…
Long Island Electrician Injured at Airport Teams Up with Public Interest Law Firm to Hold the Government Accountable
NEW YORK—In his first week on the job at Long Island MacArthur Airport, Gino Fiermonte was shocked and seriously injured. According to Gino, the accident happened because a Federal Aviation Administration…
After Wrongly Raiding Woman’s Home, Government’s Response Only Raises More Questions
ATLANTA—Cathy George sued officers who wrongly raided her Sandy Springs, Georgia, home demanding answers for how this dangerous mistake happened. Months later, the few answers Cathy has received have only led…
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Innocent Man’s Case Seeking to Hold Federal Agents Accountable for Brutalizing Him More Than a Decade Ago
WASHINGTON—Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case brought by an innocent man who was brutalized by members of a joint state-federal task force when he was a college student in 2014. This was…
Project on Immunity and Accountability Legislation
Immunity and Accountability
Protecting Everyone’s Constitutional Rights Act (PECRA)
This model bill guarantees that if citizens must follow the law, state and local government officials must follow the Constitution.
Immunity and Accountability
Protecting Everyone’s Constitutional Rights Ordinance (PECRO)
Constitutional rights mean little without a practical way to enforce them. Yet many people whose rights are violated by state or local officials never receive a remedy because of immunity doctrines and procedural barriers…
Immunity and Accountability
State Court Remedies for Constitutional Violations by Federal Employees Act
State legislators’ most important responsibility is to protect rights under the laws and constitutions of the United States and its states. This responsibility includes providing a remedy of damages against government officials who violate those rights.
Related Amicus Briefs
DeLanis v. Baker Donelson
U.S. Supreme Court
Lowery v. Mills
United States Supreme Court
Deep South Today, et al. v. Murrill, et al.
5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Aprileo v. Clapprood, et al.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Brown v. Pouncy
United States Supreme Court
Locke v. County of Hubbard
United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
J.W. v. Paley
United States Supreme Court
Tanvir v. Tanzin
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Project on Immunity and Accountability Research
Immunity and Accountability
Unaccountable
The largest ever study of qualified immunity cases, Unaccountable finds the doctrine shields a wider array of officials and conduct than commonly thought while unacceptably burdening victims of government abuse and failing at its goals.
Immunity and Accountability
Constitutional GPA
Constitutional rights only exist if they can be enforced. But a confusing patchwork of immunity doctrines and special rules often means they cannot be. Chief among the doctrines that prevent constitutional accountability is qualified immunity,…
Project on Immunity and Accountability Podcasts
January 08, 2026
Americans Keep Getting Caught Up In Immigration Raids
Leo Garcia Venegas and George Retes were simply trying to work, when they got ensnared by dragnet federal immigration raids. Even though both men identified […]
Listen NowAugust 25, 2025
Cop’s Lies Sent Innocent Girls to Prison…Still Employed.
In this episode, we bring you the disturbing story of St. Paul police officer Heather Weyker, whose lies led to the wrongful prosecution of dozens […]
Listen NowOctober 24, 2024
Officer Caught Snitching on Domestic Abuse Victim
In 2013, a Clovis, California police officer found out that his girlfriend Desiree Martinez had reported him for physically abusing her—while Desiree was trapped in […]
Listen NowAugust 09, 2024
Short Circuit 336 | Thor’s Seizure
A most unusual Fourth Amendment case this week: One cop claims there was a seizure while another says there was not. They disagree because one […]
Listen Now

