[Click here for Episode 1.]
In 1873, the Supreme Court said that the Privileges or Immunities Clause protects a right to “use the navigable waters of the United States”—and not much else. But in the nearly 150 years since, the Court has never examined what the right to use the navigable waters means in practice. On this episode: a pair of brothers from Stehekin, Washington, try to change that.
Click here for transcript. Available on iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, and Stitcher.
Resources
More information on Courtney v. Danner
The Waterman’s Song, David S. Cecelski
Black Jacks: African American Seamen in the Age of Sail, W. Jeffrey Bolster
Recent Episodes
March 16, 2022
State Remedies | SEASON 2, EP. 11
With the doors to federal court closing on civil rights claims, this final episode of Season 2 heads to new terrain: state court. Click here for […]
Read MoreNovember 10, 2021
Prosecutors, Perjurers, and Other Non-Persons — Part 2 | Season 2, Ep. 10
In 1983, in the case of Briscoe v. LaHue, the Supreme Court ruled that government employees who commit perjury at trial are absolutely immune from […]
Read MoreNovember 05, 2021
Prosecutors, Perjurers, and Other Non-Persons — Part 1 | Season 2, Ep. 10
In 2005, Charles Rehberg annoyed some politically powerful people in his community of Albany, Georgia, and found himself facing serious criminal charges—charges that were completely […]
Read MoreSeptember 01, 2021
Closing the Courthouse Doors | Season 2, Ep. 9
On this episode, we take stock of developments in the courts and in Congress since this season began. There’s an update on the first case […]
Read More