[Click here for Episode 1.]

In 1873, the Supreme Court said that the Privileges or Immunities Clause protects a right to “use the navigable waters of the United States”—and not much else. But in the nearly 150 years since, the Court has never examined what the right to use the navigable waters means in practice. On this episode: a pair of brothers from Stehekin, Washington, try to change that.

Click here for transcript. Available on iTunesSpotify, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, and Stitcher.

Guests

Cliff Courtney, Stehekin Valley Ranch

Michael Bindas, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice

Resources

More information on Courtney v. Danner

The Waterman’s Song, David S. Cecelski

Black Jacks: African American Seamen in the Age of Sail, W. Jeffrey Bolster

 

Recent Episodes

A Pig in a Parlor | Season 3, Ep. 4

In 1926, in the case of Euclid v. Ambler, the Supreme Court upheld zoning, giving elected officials and city planners vast, new, and largely unchecked […]

Read More

A Lost World | Season 3, Ep. 3

On Episode 3, we journey back to a lost world: the world before zoning. And we take a look at a trio of historic property […]

Read More

Groping in a Fog | Season 3, Ep. 2

In 1922, Scranton, Pennsylvania was said to be on the verge of collapsing into the vast coal mines beneath the city; residents, buildings, and streets […]

Read More

Mr. Thornton's Woods | Season 3, Ep. 1

In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents […]

Read More