In 2005, Charles Rehberg annoyed some politically powerful people in his community of Albany, Georgia, and found himself facing serious criminal charges—charges that were completely made up by a rogue prosecutor and could only be sustained because an investigator committed perjury. In Episode 10, we explore the case of Rehberg v. Paulk, which reached the Supreme Court in 2012.

On Part 1 of Episode 10: the doctrine of absolute prosecutorial immunity, where it came from, and why the Supreme Court thinks it’s a good idea.

Click here for transcript. Click here for Episode 1.

Click for Apple PodcastsSpotifyGoogle PodcastsTuneIn, and Stitcher.

The post Prosecutors, Perjurers, and Other Non-Persons — Part 1 | Season 2, Ep. 10 appeared first on Institute for Justice.

Recent Episodes

This is Mine | Season 3, Ep. 6

On this episode, we take a break from case law and go way back to the beginning to examine the origins and justifications of private […]

Listen Now

A Pig in a Parlor | Season 3, Ep. 4

In 1926, in the case of Euclid v. Ambler, the Supreme Court upheld zoning, giving elected officials and city planners vast, new, and largely unchecked […]

Listen Now

A Lost World | Season 3, Ep. 3

On Episode 3, we journey back to a lost world: the world before zoning. And we take a look at a trio of historic property […]

Listen Now