By any measure, the conditions that Lee Saunders endured in the psych unit at the Brevard County jail in Florida were shockingly inhumane. But when he sued over the overcrowding, abusive treatment, and denial of basic sanitation, the courts ruled that the officer in charge was immune from suit. On this episode, we explore the state of qualified immunity doctrine today and whether the Supreme Court’s justifications for its policy of shielding officials from suit—even when they have violated the Constitution—hold water.
Click here for transcript.
Guests
Joanna Schwartz, UCLA Law
Robert McNamara, Institute for Justice
Elizabeth Cruikshank, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Tiffany Wright, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Coleman Watson, Watson LLP
Resources
Joanna Schwartz, Qualified Immunity’s Boldest Lie
Joanna Schwartz, Police Indemnification
Joanna Schwartz, How Qualified Immunity Fails
Recent Episodes
Younger abstention | Season 4, Ep. 4
In 1966, Los Angeles officials tried to put a man in prison for handing out leaflets in protest of a fatal police shooting. Today, we […]
Listen NowOath or Affirmation. (And Treason.) | Season 4, Ep. 3
On this episode, we recover a lost part of the Fourth Amendment that the Supreme Court essentially erased in 1960. In the case of Jones […]
Listen NowNeedless Friction. And Treason.
On this episode: the story of Pullman abstention, the first of several abstention doctrines the Supreme Court invented to let federal judges decline to decide […]
Listen NowRooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the […]
Listen Now