Just in time for Thanksgiving we have two extremely juicy opinions (from a judicial engagement standpoint), one about the right to earn a living and one on the nondelegation doctrine. First, it’s our old friend Jeff Rowes of IJ who discusses how the Fifth Circuit ruled against a tanning salon that didn’t want to be shut down during the pandemic, but where the court really didn’t seem to want to. And then there’s a concurring opinion that’s all about how the right to earn a living is “deeply rooted.” Then, Trace Mitchell of IJ grabs the reins and takes us for a ride around nondelegation jurisprudence. It’s a case considering Congress’s decision to give governmental power to a private group as a method of regulating the horse racing industry. Giddy up!
Click here for transcript.
Golden Glow Tanning Salon v. City of Columbus
Nat. Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Assoc. v. Black
Short Circuit Episode on Kentucky right to earn a living case
Recent Episodes
Short Circuit 359 | Net Neutrality Flip Flops
A lot going on this week, including a lot of Short Circuit news. On the law side we talk about two recent opinions, one from […]
Listen NowMotte-and-Bailey Game
Short Circuit 358 | Motte-and-Bailey Game Can state officers simply come on your land and take samples of your dirt (and water) without a warrant? […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 357 | Drama at the City Council Meeting
City council meetings are usually sparsely attended, low key, unwatched affairs. Except when they’re not. This week we have two cases where those in power […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 356 | Christmas Sweater Law
Seasons greetings from Short Circuit! While you’re enjoying your holiday week at the end of 2024 we’re giving you the content you need: Christmas sweaters. […]
Listen Now