We revisit an issue that’s really coming into focus: cameras on poles and how they stand up to the Fourth Amendment. Mike Greenberg of IJ comes by to tell the story of a veteran who received disability benefits when, it seems, he wasn’t exactly disabled. Things get interesting when the feds put a camera on a pole (on a school) and point it at his house 24/7 for months. Is that a search? The Tenth Circuit says it isn’t and uphold his felony conviction. But, as Mike explains, other courts have disagreed. Then your host brings us some zoning plus standing plus the Establishment Clause in the suburbs of New York City. There, some residents don’t like how their village has let their Jewish neighbors open more houses of worship and claim it will “radically transmorgrify” things. Do they have an “injury”? The Second Circuit doesn’t think so.

Register for the May 10 open fields conference!

US v. Hay

Citizens United to Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Chestnut Ridge

Episode on 7th Cir pole camera case

Episode on 1st Cir pole camera case

End of The Usual Suspects (SPOILER ALERT!)

Recent Episodes

Short Circuit 432 | Moth-Eaten Precedent

A wild, and tragic, story from the Fifth Circuit with a bit of good (yet confusing) news at the end. IJ’s Diana Simpson tells us […]

Listen Now

Short Circuit 431 | Hard but not Impossible

We welcome back a treasured many-times guest, the first time since he’s left IJ. Brian Morris served in our merry band of libertarian litigators for […]

Listen Now

Short Circuit 429 | A Fifth of Circuit

In our #12Months12Circuits series it’s time to drink an entire Fifth. Now, regular listeners will be very familiar with the Fifth Circuit’s waters and may […]

Listen Now