August 6, 2009

Federal Judge Dismisses Philly Tour-Guide Lawsuit


Arlington, Va—Today, a federal district court judge dismissed a high-profile challenge to a new Philadelphia law that makes it illegal to give tours of the city without first passing a test and obtaining a license. The judge determined that the city’s budget crisis made it unlikely that the law, which allows city officials to fine guides up to $300 for engaging in unauthorized talking, would be enforced “in the near future.” He dismissed the case until the city begins enforcement.

The court’s opinion is based on the premise that the city would not enforce the law in the immediate future, even though city officials testified at trial that the law was “absolutely” important to them and that they intended to enforce it.

“The city asked the court to ignore the serious constitutional concerns presented by the law,” said Staff Attorney Robert McNamara of the Institute for Justice (IJ), which is litigating the case and defends the rights of entrepreneurs nationwide. “Tour guides in Philadelphia deserve to be able to plan their lives without worrying whether the city’s going to decide to crack down on them in six weeks, six months or a year.”

IJ brought the lawsuit on behalf of three Philadelphia-area tour guides—Mike Tait, Ann Boulais, and Josh Silver—who understand that the First Amendment gives them the right to talk about their country’s history without first getting permission from government bureaucrats. The case has received significant national media attention, including a recentfront-page feature in the Wall Street Journal.

The court’s decision also lifts an injunction that has been blocking the law’s enforcement since October of last year. The court made clear, however, that its decision did not mean the law would survive constitutional scrutiny:

“Defendant’s financial inability to enforce the challenged law against plaintiffs or any other individual at this time vitiates ripeness. . . . If and when [defendant has the resources to enforce the law], plaintiffs may renew their constitutional challenge.”

IJ attorneys intend to appeal the ruling to the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Government officials shouldn’t be allowed to hide in the bushes until they feel like jumping out and taking away your rights,” concluded McNamara. “The city’s budget woes do not put the Constitution on hold, and we have every intention of vindicating the rights of Philadelphia’s tour guides in court.”

Share

More on First Amendment

Elizabeth Brokamp, a licensed therapist who lives in Virginia, challenged a D.C. law that barred therapists outside the district from doing online teletherapy visits with clients in D.C.

First Amendment

Virginia Counselor Wins Lawsuit Challenging District of Columbia’s Restrictions on Teletherapy Sessions

Dan King · June 25, 2026

IJ’s appellate court victory for Lauren Richwine, an Indiana 'death doula' giving advice to the dying and their loved ones, is another sign IJ’s pioneering stance on occupational speech is winning over judges.

First Amendment

Fort Wayne Death Doula Secures Final Victory in First Amendment Lawsuit Challenging State’s Restrictions on Discussing End-of-Life Care

Dan King · June 11, 2026

Don Fletcher, Ashley Fore, Sherry Digmon, and Cindy Jackson suffered were charged with bogus crimes by the Escambia County, Alabama district attorney and sheriff. They are suing over the retaliatory arrests.

First Amendment

Lawsuit Against Alabama District Attorney and Sheriff Who Punished Political Opponents and Reporter Moves Forward

Andrew Wimer · March 26, 2026