February 3, 2025

Ocean Springs Property Owners Will Appeal Dismissal of Lawsuit

Federal lawsuit seeks to end Mississippi government’s ability to secretly label property as “slum or blighted.”

Faye Payton stands in front of her family's home in Ocean Springs.
Faye Payton stands in front of her family's home in Ocean Springs.

GULFPORT, Miss.—Late Friday, a federal district court dismissed a lawsuit from Ocean Springs property owners who had their homes and businesses labeled by the city as slum and blighted, without notice and without the ability to appeal. Much of Ocean Springs’ historically Black district, with homes handed down from generation to generation, was targeted in a 2023 redevelopment plan. Owners of homes and businesses and a church sued with the Institute for Justice (IJ).

“The city didn’t tell us about the slum and blight last time. Why would they tell us next time?” said Faye Payton, whose family owns a home on Cash Alley. “This fight is not over yet, and we shall not be moved.”

U.S. District Judge Taylor McNeel granted the city’s motion to dismiss but also rejected the city’s claim that the case was moot after the city rescinded the slum and blight designation. The judge concluded that the city’s action was a legislative action that did not require notice or could be reviewed by courts.

“Mississippi governments cannot brand neighborhoods as slums in secret,” said IJ Senior Vice President and Litigation Director Dana Berliner. “Obviously telling a person about something when it’s too late to do anything is not the meaningful opportunity to be heard that the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process Clause requires.”

A slum and blight label allows cities to take property by eminent domain, and the only opportunity to challenge that label is 10 days after the city labels it. But without any notice, the owners learned about the label months later—far too late to appeal the designation.

The court was persuaded by the fact that, although they could no longer challenge slum and blight (the strongest defense against eminent domain), they could still bring other (weaker) defenses.

“The fact that they can bring some other, weaker opposition to the taking of their property is cold comfort to owners who want to keep their homes, businesses, and churches,” said IJ Attorney Suranjan Sen.

Share

More on Private Property

Dog sniffing a cardboard box in a warehouse stacked high with wrapped packages

Private Property

Court Says Marion County Must Clearly State What Crime Was Committed Before Taking Money Seized at FedEx Hub

Andrew Wimer · October 20, 2026

Carlos Pena points to a hole in a door at his North Hollywood printing shop, which was destroyed by an LAPD SWAT team in August 2022. The city refused to compensate Carlos.

Private Property

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Los Angeles Business Owner’s Case Seeking Compensation After SWAT Team Destroyed Shop

Andrew Wimer · October 19, 2026

Sidewalk beside a certified wildlife habitat garden in Jeremy Boggess and Kristi Church's front yard

Private Property

Victory! Danville Confirms Award-Winning Garden Complies with Local Code After IJ Letter

Christopher Ingraham · September 28, 2026