Virginia
Final grade: C
Exclusion Grade
C-
Relevance Grade
C+
Due Process Grade
C
Strengths
- Boards must consider evidence of rehabilitation.
Areas of Improvement
- Ban boards from using “moral turpitude” or “fitness” to disqualify applicants.
- Extend state’s protections to the Department of Health.
- Strengthen safeguards for due process by requiring a petition process and placing the burden of proof on the state.
With below-average protections, Virginia earned a C- for its final grade. The state at first appears to have a strong relevancy test, barring boards governed by the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation from denying licenses unless the criminal record “directly relates” to the license sought. Unfortunately, this test is immediately undermined by a loophole that lets boards disqualify applicants if they are “unfit or unsuited to engage in such occupation or profession,” which is a far lower standard.
Moreover, boards governed by the Department of Health are completely exempt, allowing those boards to disqualify applicants on the basis of any felony or crime of moral turpitude, regardless of its relevance.
Statute: Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-204 (1979)
Exclusion
Overarching ban on blanket bans | Yes, but excludes Health Department licenses |
Ban on considering arrest records | No |
Ban on considering post-conviction relief records | Yes, expunged records |
Time limit | No limit |
Ban on vague, discretionary character standards | No |
Relevance
Relationship between the crime and the license sought | "Unfit or unsuited" |
Required factors for consideration | |
Rehabilitation | Yes |
Time elapsed since crime was committed | Yes |
Age when crime was committed | Yes |
Employment History | Yes |
Testimonials | No |
Due Process
Petition Process | No, but boards must offer applicants an opportunity to be heard before deciding to disqualify |
Burden of Proof | Standard unspecified, burden on the applicant |
Right to appeal | Yes |
Written notice requirement | Yes |