The Past Should Not Shackle the Present
In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court ruled that school voucher programs in which parents choose which schools, including religiously affiliated schools, their children attend do not violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. The consequences of Zelman were dramatic: First, the hundreds of children enrolled in Cleveland’s school choice program were spared a return to schools that had consistently failed to provide them with a competent, much less quality, education. Second, teachers’ unions and other opponents of school choice can no longer use. . .
Related Cases
Wyoming Families Head to Court to Keep Education Choice Program Alive
Wyoming families intervene to defend education savings accounts for parents who choose alternatives to public school.
Educational Choice | Publicly Funded Scholarships
Parents File Petition to Restore South Carolina Educational Choice Program
In 2023, South Carolina created the Education Scholarship Trust Fund (“ESTF”) program. This student aid program grants thousands of qualifying, low-income families a $6,000 scholarship that parents can use for educational expenses for their children—things…
Educational Choice | Publicly Funded Scholarships
Arkansas Mothers Intervene to Defend Education Freedom Accounts Program Against Lawsuit
Arkansas parents defend a state program that provides eligible families with thousands of dollars to cover certain educational expenses.