Tempe, Arizona

City of Tempe v. McGregor
Battling Bogus Blight in Tempe, Arizona 

Donna McGregor and Del Sturman own and operate Desert Composites, a machine shop that manufactures various aerospace parts.  Their shop, a heavy industrial use, operated for years in an industrial park on land located in a Maricopa County “island” abutting the City of Tempe.  In 1999, at the behest of a private developer who owned land in the area, the City of Tempe annexed the county island and began working with that developer to redevelop the area.

The annexation agreement between Tempe and the property owners required the city to spend nearly one million dollars for “the cost of construction of . . . street improvements, water and sewer lines and conduits and drainage improvements.”  Current property owners had expected to share in the benefits of new construction – but Tempe instead planned to bestow the benefits on that single private developer who desired to construct an enormous retail shopping center on the land.

Over the next several years, the city created a Redevelopment Area, issued a Request for Proposals, and not surprisingly selected the same developer they worked with to annex the land, adopted a Redevelopment Plan and ultimately filed condemnation actions to force 13 property owners off their land.  The property owners hired private counsel to fight against the blatant abuse of eminent domain and Institute for Justice lawyers gladly worked with those lawyers as part of a joint defense agreement. 

The Superior Court ruled in favor of the property owners, relying on the Bailey precedent set by the Institute for Justice two years earlier, writing that “profit, not public improvement, is the motivating force for this redevelopment” project.  The City of Tempe sought expedited review of the case in the Arizona Supreme Court, specifically seeking to have the Bailey precedent overruled.  The Institute for Justice co-authored the appellate briefs to protect McGregor and Sturman from abuse as well as to ensure the continuing validity of the Bailey case.  The Arizona Supreme Court ultimately declined to hear the case on its merits and the developers announced soon thereafter that they would move forward with the project without McGregor’s land.

Essential Background

Images

Release: Arizona Supreme Court Declines Review Of Tempe Eminent Domain Case (November 29, 2005)

Client Photo - none available

Client Video - none available

Release: Tempe Property Owners Score Victory Over Eminent Domain Abuse (September 13, 2005)

 

Legal Briefs and Decisions

none available

 

Case Timeline

Filed Lawsuit:

 

March 9, 2005

Court Filed:

 

Superior Court for the State of Arizona, Maricopa County

Decision(s):

 

September 13, 2005: Trial court victory

November 29, 2005: Arizona Supreme Court declines to accept the case on expedited review.

February 28, 2006: Final judgment entered by trial court with no further appeals filed.

Status:

 

Case Completed; Victory for Property Owners & IJ

 

 

 

Additional Releases

 

Maps, Charts and Facts

Release: Property Owners to Arizona Supreme Court: Don’t Overrule the Bailey Brake Shop Case (October 27, 2005)

none available

 

 

 

 

Op-eds, News Articles and Links

 

 

none available


Email Address
Please enter a valid email address
Share

Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
Tel 703.682.9320, Fax 703.682.9321
© 1997-2014