January 21, 2021

Victory for Food Trucks in South Texas

Operating a small business is challenging enough these days without the government picking winners and losers. But that’s exactly what city officials did to food truck owners hoping to earn a living in South Padre Island, Texas. This past December, IJ ended that blatant protectionism. 

Until 2016, this Texas tourist destination in the Rio Grande Valley banned mobile food vendors from serving crowds of hungry beachgoers. When the city finally allowed food truck entrepreneurs in, local restaurant owners complained. In response, the City Council allowed them to rewrite the ordinance and add two anticompetitive provisions. The new provisions capped the number of food truck permits at a mere 12 and required applicants to obtain the signature of a local restaurant owner—their brick-and-mortar competitors—to even qualify for one of the permits.

IJ sued, and the district court struck down both the city’s absurd permit cap and the restaurant-permission scheme that allowed local restaurant owners to act as gatekeepers to food truck permits. This victory removes both barriers for food truck owners like IJ clients SurfVive, a local nonprofit that promotes healthy food options, and brothers Anubis and Adonai Avalos, who operate a vegan food truck in nearby Brownsville, Texas, when they are not teaching music. Each stood shoulder to shoulder with IJ through 21 months of intense litigation. 

IJ’s latest victory on behalf of food trucks is also reflective of our strategic approach to creating long-term legal change. This challenge against South Padre Island builds upon our 2015 victory in Patel v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation—IJ’s landmark Texas Supreme Court win for eyebrow threading entrepreneur Ash Patel. Patel cemented meaningful judicial review in economic liberty challenges under the Texas Constitution. IJ’s challenge in the Rio Grande Valley not only applies that precedent but also seeks to extend it by establishing that laws serving only to pick winners and losers in the marketplace violate the Texas Constitution.

The city has appealed this decision, so IJ will press on to defend our victory—and the rights of all Texas entrepreneurs—at the court of appeals.

Arif Panju is managing attorney of IJ’s Texas office.

Share

Also in this Issue

Liberty & Law

The Case for Abolishing Civil Forfeiture Has Never Been Stronger—or More Urgent

January 21, 2021

SONY DSC

Liberty & Law

IJ’s Civil Forfeiture Work Seizes the Spotlight—and Secures Change

January 21, 2021

Elizabeth Brokamp, a licensed therapist who lives in Virginia, challenged a D.C. law that barred therapists outside the district from doing online teletherapy visits with clients in D.C.

Liberty & Law

License to Zoom? As Therapy Moves Online, IJ Fights for the Right to Talk Across State Lines

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

Law Enforcement Veteran Asks Supreme Court to Protect His Rights—and the Constitution

January 21, 2021

Dan Huffman, Elizabeth Huffman, Lindsey Gardner, Fran Harvey, Jennifer Ledford, Bud Smith, Mary Smith

Liberty & Law

Shelter in Place — If Zoning Officials Let You

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

Big Apple Raises Revenue by Leveling Property Owners

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

IJ Soars In to Fight Outrageous Fines and Fees in Eagle, Wisconsin

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

Long-Awaited Victory for Virtual Veterinarian

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

Giving Smarter With Your IRA

January 21, 2021

Liberty & Law

Windy City Entrepreneurs Aim for the Sky in South Side Pitch Competition

January 21, 2021

Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!

Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.