Prohibitions on excessive fines date back at least as far as Magna Carta in 1215, and the U.S. Constitution has barred excessive fines since 1791. But the Supreme Court has only recently begun to interpret what the Excessive Fines Clause means, and it wasn’t until 2019 that the Court said the Clause applies to the states.
On this episode: the story of how the Supreme Court finally began to incorporate the Bill of Rights rights against the states and the history of excessive fines.
Click here for transcript. Click here for Episode 1.
Click for iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, and Stitcher.
Guests
Beth Colgan, UCLA Law
Marc Lendler, Smith College
Robert Thomas, William & Mary Law
Wesley Hottot, Institute for Justice
Resources
Timbs v. Indiana case page
Reviving the Excessive Fines Clause, by Beth Colgan
The Excessive Fines Clause: Challenging the Modern Debtor’s Prison, by Beth Colgan
Gitlow v. New York: Every Idea an Incitement, by Marc Lendler
The definitive Chicago B. & Q.R. Co. v. Chicago blog post, by Robert Thomas
Free Speech in its Forgotten Years, 1870-1920, by David Rabban
Recent Episodes
Younger abstention | Season 4, Ep. 4
In 1966, Los Angeles officials tried to put a man in prison for handing out leaflets in protest of a fatal police shooting. Today, we […]
Listen NowOath or Affirmation. (And Treason.) | Season 4, Ep. 3
On this episode, we recover a lost part of the Fourth Amendment that the Supreme Court essentially erased in 1960. In the case of Jones […]
Listen NowNeedless Friction. And Treason.
On this episode: the story of Pullman abstention, the first of several abstention doctrines the Supreme Court invented to let federal judges decline to decide […]
Listen NowRooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the […]
Listen Now