Prohibitions on excessive fines date back at least as far as Magna Carta in 1215, and the U.S. Constitution has barred excessive fines since 1791. But the Supreme Court has only recently begun to interpret what the Excessive Fines Clause means, and it wasn’t until 2019 that the Court said the Clause applies to the states.
On this episode: the story of how the Supreme Court finally began to incorporate the Bill of Rights rights against the states and the history of excessive fines.
Click here for transcript. Click here for Episode 1.
Click for iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, and Stitcher.
Guests
Beth Colgan, UCLA Law
Marc Lendler, Smith College
Robert Thomas, William & Mary Law
Wesley Hottot, Institute for Justice
Resources
Timbs v. Indiana case page
Reviving the Excessive Fines Clause, by Beth Colgan
The Excessive Fines Clause: Challenging the Modern Debtor’s Prison, by Beth Colgan
Gitlow v. New York: Every Idea an Incitement, by Marc Lendler
The definitive Chicago B. & Q.R. Co. v. Chicago blog post, by Robert Thomas
Free Speech in its Forgotten Years, 1870-1920, by David Rabban
Recent Episodes
Punishment Without Crime | Season 3, Ep. 9
Civil forfeiture is a civil rights nightmare, allowing police and prosecutors to seize billions of dollars’ worth of property annually—cash, cars, houses, bank accounts, and […]
Listen NowPublic Purpose | Season 3, Ep. 8
In 2005, in the case of Kelo v. New London, the Supreme Court allowed officials to seize and raze an entire neighborhood of well-maintained homes […]
Listen NowThe Despotic Power | Season 3, Ep. 7
On this episode: Berman v. Parker, the Supreme Court’s decision in 1954 to abandon previous constitutional limits on the government’s power to take property from […]
Listen NowThis is Mine | Season 3, Ep. 6
On this episode, we take a break from case law and go way back to the beginning to examine the origins and justifications of private […]
Listen Now
