The checkmate doctrine, right to pre-indictment counsel, and Uber antitrust. With special guest William C. Marra of Cooper & Kirk.

Use iTunes? https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/short-circuit/id309062019
Use Android (RSS)? http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:84493247/sounds.rss
Newsletter: http://ij.org/about-us/shortcircuit/
Want to email us? [email protected]

Checkmate: http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0065p-06.pdf
Pre-indictment counsel: http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0058p-06.pdf
Uber monopoly: http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/171871p.pdf

Recent Episodes

September 15, 2023

Short Circuit 289 | Property Rights FTW

We celebrate, and dig into, two victories for property rights this week—both in IJ cases! First, IJ’s Wesley Hottot discusses the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in […]

Read More

September 07, 2023

Short Circuit 288 | Nondelegating Warrants

Two old favorites this week: The nondelegation doctrine and the phrase “come back with a warrant.” And both from the culturally varied Sixth Circuit. First, […]

Read More

August 30, 2023

Short Circuit 287 | Where the Sidewalk Ends

The members of the Nashville City Council are apparently big fans of sidewalks to nowhere. In order for property owners to get a permit they […]

Read More