We’re joined by two friends from the MacArthur Justice Center, Emily Washington and Eric Foley, to tell us all about a blood-boiling case of prosecutorial misconduct, concocted evidence, and lying to put a man on death row. They are fighting an epic battle in the Fifth Circuit against many things in their case, but this week we focus on one especially: absolute immunity, a special benefit prosecutors often—but not always—enjoy. Did the prosecutor enjoy it in their lawsuit? Listen to find out. There’s not just one, but two concurrences by Judge Jim Ho of the Fifth Circuit (who news reports say festively sends out Christmas cards, along with his family, using the slogan “Ho, Ho, Ho”). And then IJ’s own Anya Bidwell tells us about “Wanteds.” They’re not warrants, but they’re nevertheless often used. Were they a thing at common law, and are they “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment? There’s another concurrence that makes the case.
Click here for transcript.
Wearry v. Foster (3 judge panel)
Wearry v. Foster (denial of en banc)
Resources
Wearry v. Foster (3 judge panel)
Wearry v. Foster (denial of en banc)
Bound By Oath (Absolute Immunity)
Laurent Sacharoff, The Broken Fourth Amendment Oath
Recent Episodes
Short Circuit 368 | Flipping the Bird
Is stretching out one’s middle finger at the police protected by the First Amendment? And whether it is or not, can the police trump up […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 367 | The Police Power
Often in old constitutional cases you see judges of yonder years invoking this mysterious substance called “the police power.” It’s something that has fallen out […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 366 | I Love You But Can’t
What’s the difference between a campaign contribution and a bribe? More than the Sixth Circuit seemed to think. Or so argues Paul Sherman of IJ […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 365 | I Like Old Property
A long-time friend of the Institute for Justice, Robert Thomas, joins us this week. For years he’s litigated property rights cases across the country, lately […]
Listen Now