Two holiday delights this week: The right of a former president to say “Deranged prosecutor Jack Smith” and the proper standard when officials recklessly fail to keep a suicide watch. First it’s Paul Sherman with the D.C. Circuit’s analysis of how former President Trump’s speech can be curtailed while he’s being prosecuted in Washington, D.C. The First Amendment interest is high, but is it high enough? Even though the court applies strict scrutiny the answer is mostly no. Paul explains how it seems like a good precedent when it is applied to less exceptional cases in the future. Then Patrick Jaicomo brings us to the Fourth Circuit where a woman tragically killed herself while in a jail—and while the jail’s staff knew she had already tried to. To get there, though, the court needed to clean up some of its caselaw and square it with what the Supreme Court has said.
Click here for transcript.
Recent Episodes
Short Circuit 340 | No Way to Run a Railroad
An extremely sad case, especially for man’s best friend (dog-lover discretion is advised!), and a happy case for property rights. First, the Center for Judicial […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 339 | The Crime of Journalism
Part of the job description of a journalist is talk to public officials, gather information, and report on it. Unfortunately, that seems to be a […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 338 | Geofence Warrants
One reason we have a Fourth Amendment is to be free from general warrants, permission slips for the government to search, well, everything. Is that […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 337 | Facebook Comment Board of Appeals
Anyone who has ever grown enraged after seeing their comment deleted from a Facebook page will find solace in this week’s episode. We examine a […]
Listen Now