We’re gonna read you the Riot Act. Again. An old friend of Short Circuit returns, the Anti-Riot Act. Perhaps (?) named in homage to its 18th century predecessor, the Congressional statute received a facial test at the Seventh Circuit, and IJ’s Kirby Thomas West tells us how it fared in the face of a guy who requested that everyone bring their family and a brick to a “riot.” He did not do so well in court, but perhaps the Anti-Riot Act has problems anyway? Then we go for a drive down a Houston freeway where Sam Gedge makes a citizen’s arrest of a qualified immunity claim while drinking at a local flea market at 2am. The Fifth Circuit served up a wild ride of a case that is too good to pass up but also holds bigger lessons for how judges perceive “split-second decisions” and premeditated lies.
Recent Episodes
Short Circuit 340 | No Way to Run a Railroad
An extremely sad case, especially for man’s best friend (dog-lover discretion is advised!), and a happy case for property rights. First, the Center for Judicial […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 339 | The Crime of Journalism
Part of the job description of a journalist is talk to public officials, gather information, and report on it. Unfortunately, that seems to be a […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 338 | Geofence Warrants
One reason we have a Fourth Amendment is to be free from general warrants, permission slips for the government to search, well, everything. Is that […]
Listen NowShort Circuit 337 | Facebook Comment Board of Appeals
Anyone who has ever grown enraged after seeing their comment deleted from a Facebook page will find solace in this week’s episode. We examine a […]
Listen Now