Short Circuit 348 | Excessive Fines and the IRS

Is a “fine” a “fine”? No, not at all, and therefore it can’t be “excessive.” At least that’s the IRS’s position. Thankfully that argument was rejected in a recent Eleventh Circuit case about a taxpayer who failed to file some forms and was subsequently fined—yes, fined—millions of dollars. IJ’s Sam Gedge explains this story and what fines the court thought were excessive and were not. We also look at the Ninth Circuit and an odd rule (that only exists there) which turns dicta into law. Jacob Harcar of IJ provides the holding and some well-reasoned portions of his opinion as well. Further, as a special treat, Jacob tells us of some work he’s done on legislative immunity and Reconstruction. Plus, do you know the difference between an acronym and an initialism? Whatever it is, we hope you won’t say the two flirted excessively.

U.S. v. Schwarzbaum

Stein v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

Gorsuch dissent in Toth v. U.S. denial

Timbs v. Indiana

Short Circuit episode on dicta in 9th Cir.

Jacob’s Section 1983 article

Excessive flirting in Emma

Recent Episodes

Short Circuit 353 | Jurisdictional Mavens

Notable—and quotable—Chicago lawyer Patrick Eckler joins us for a crash-course in Seventh Circuit paranoia (if you’re paranoid about jurisdictional questions at oral argument—which you really […]

Listen Now

Short Circuit 352 | Misinformation

We go online for some First Amendment content this week. First, IJ’s Jeff Redfern explains how the Eleventh Circuit concluded that CNN might be liable […]

Listen Now

Short Circuit 351 | State Court Shenanigans

A couple friends drop by this week who have overstayed their welcome: Rooker and Feldman. Together they make up the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, a weed that […]

Listen Now

Short Circuit 350 | In rem Liechtenstein

Can the U.S. government use civil forfeiture in a U.S. court to take property in another country? One of IJ’s directors of our National Initiative […]

Listen Now