Norfolk Virginia Free Speech
Central Radio Company v. City of Norfolk
Signs of Abuse in Norfolk, Virginia
![]() |
||
| . | IJ client Bob Wilson | |
![]() |
||
| IJ clients Bob Wilson and Kelly Dickinson are being blocked by the city of Norfolk, Va., from displaying a banner protesting eminent domain abuse. | ||
|
|
||
In a double blow against free speech and property rights, the city of Norfolk, Va., is not only planning to take a thriving business using its power of eminent domain, but it also wants to censor a powerful and highly visible sign protesting the city’s action.
IJ filed a suit in federal court defending the First Amendment right to protest government action on behalf of Central Radio Company, one of its owners, Bob Wilson, and its vice president, Kelly Dickinson. The city has ordered the sign to be removed. Central Radio, which has been building and repairing ship-based radio equipment in Norfolk since Bob’s uncle founded the company in 1934, has been involved in a two-year battle with the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority (NRHA) to keep its property. The NRHA condemned more than 170 residential, institutional and business buildings in the Hampton Boulevard area near Old Dominion University, claiming the area was blighted, in order to hand the properties over to the university. The university currently has no specific plans for the use of Central Radio’s property. After losing an initial fight in Virginia trial court to keep their property, Bob and Kelly decided to take their battle to the court of public opinion. With Central Radio co-owner Ed Dickinson, they hung a 375-square-foot banner on the side of their building.
In an effort to shut down the protest against government abuse, city inspectors soon came calling and cited Central Radio for violating Norfolk’s sign code. The code prevents Central Radio from posting a sign any larger than 60 square feet—one sixth the size of their current sign, which can currently be read from blocks away on busy Hampton Road.
|
Essential Background |
Images and Media |
|
|
Press Conference Video (May 2, 2012) |
||
|
Rally Photos (July 5, 2012) |
||
|
Launch Release: Institute for Justice Challenges City's Censorship Of Anti-Eminent Domain Abuse Sign (May 2, 2012) |
Legal Briefs and Decisions |
|
|
Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (May 15, 2013) |
||
|
|
||
|
Case Timeline |
||
|
Filed Complaint:
|
May 2, 2012 |
|
|
Court Filed:
|
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
|
Decision(s):
|
None Available |
|
|
Current Court:
|
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
|
|
Status:
|
TBA |
|
|
Next Key Date:
|
TBA |
|
|
Additional Releases |
Maps, Charts and Facts |
|
|
Release: Not a Banner for Free Speech (August 7, 2012) |
none available | |
|
|
Op-eds, News Articles and Links |
|
| Article: Norfolk Virginia Free Speech-Hearing Update IJ Website (July, 2012) | ||
| Article: This Land is MY Land IJ Website (July 5, 2012) | ||
| Article: Norfolk business owners rally support to keep property WVAC (July 6, 2012) | ||
| Article: Free Speech and Property Rights Under Attack in Norfolk Liberty & Law (June, 2012) | ||
| Video: Protest Signs Not Allowed The Stossel Show FOX Business (May 18, 2012) | ||
| Op/Ed: Norfolk tries to impose radio silence Richmond Times Dispatch (May 8, 2012) | ||
| Article: From property rights to free speech The Virginian-Pilot (May 2, 2012) | ||
| Article: Norfolk Virginia Free Speech IJ Website (May 2, 2012) | ||
| Link: Norfolk Signs IJ Website (July 26, 2011) | ||
- Contribution Limits and the “Appearance of Corruption”
- L&L-8-12- IJ Leads the Fight to Protect Occupational Speech from Government Restrictions
- North Carolina Free Speech
- SpeechNow.org and the Birth of Super PACs
- 9th Circuit Upholds Injunction Protecting Free Speech in Recall Campaigns




