Augie and Brian, as good citizens, dutifully applied for a mural permit. But Mandan officials stymied Augie and Brian at every turn. The city said that because Lonesome Dove’s name appeared in the artwork, it couldn’t be a mural, since murals could not be “intended to advertise an establishment.” Nor could Lonesome Dove get a sign permit, since commercial signs couldn’t be painted on a building’s walls. After a five-month ordeal, Augie and Brian were told to remove the mural by May 23, 2019, or face thousands of dollars in fines.
But Augie and Brian had a different idea. Teaming up with the Institute for Justice, Augie and Brian filed a lawsuit against the city of Mandan to save their mural and vindicate their rights to free speech under the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment prohibits the government from playing art critic, telling people to change their mural’s message or discriminating against business’s speech.
A federal court readily agreed, holding that Mandan would likely lose the case and ordering the city not to fine Lonesome Dove while the lawsuit proceeded. Reading the writing on the wall, Mandan rewrote its entire mural code to remove the arbitrary and unconstitutional provisions that had stymied Augie and Brian. In that same rewrite, Mandan agreed that Lonesome Dove’s mural could stay up, no government permission slip needed.
Augie and Brian’s advocacy saved not only their mural, but improved the free-speech rights of everyone in city. And their victory should serve as a warning to other cities that think they have the power to pick and choose who may speak and about what. Under the First Amendment, the right to speak is just that, a right, and not a privilege to be doled out by government officials.
Case Team
Attorneys

Erica Smith Ewing
Senior Attorney

Robert Frommer
Senior Attorney

Paul Sherman
Senior Attorney
Case Documents
Complaint
TRO Blocking Enforcement Action Against Clients
Related Cases

Commercial Speech | First Amendment
Owner of medical cannabis dispensary files federal lawsuit challenging Mississippi's ban on truthful advertising
If it’s legal to sell a product, it’s also legal to talk about that product. But not in Mississippi—at least not if the product is medical marijuana. In 2022 Mississippi joined the growing number of…

Commercial Speech | First Amendment | Food Freedom
Lawsuit seeks to strike down regulations that prevent businesses from truthfully labeling products
The First Amendment does not allow the government to decide which facts consumers are allowed to know. Yet the federal government is preventing tens of millions of Americans with sensitive stomachs from receiving the information…

Commercial Speech | First Amendment | Food Freedom
Oklahoma requires vegan products to rewrite their labels to the meat lobby’s satisfaction
Oklahoma requires plant-based meat products to include a massive disclaimer on their label, similar to that seen on tobacco products. IJ is challenging this foolish regulation that does nothing to promote public safety and also…