July 30, 2012

A Caveman Goes to Court

Abigail Van Buren, the beloved author known as Dear Abby, is warmly remembered for her commonsense advice to readers on marriage, parenting and other relationship issues. But was her column also a 50-year crime spree?

North Carolina would seem to think so. The North Carolina Board of Dietetics/Nutrition sent diet blogger Steve Cooksey a 19-page print-out of his online writings—including his Dear Abby-style advice column—with red-pen comments in the margin indicating what Steve may and may not say without a government-issued dietitian’s license. In a nutshell, North Carolina contends that Steve can make general statements like “avocados are good for you,” but that it is a crime to offer personal advice such as “you should eat avocados” in response to a reader question.

Steve has been thrust into this censorship dispute because he decided to share his dramatic transformation to help others. Three years ago, Steve was an obese couch potato. He was rushed to the hospital in a near-diabetic coma and diagnosed with Type II diabetes, a result of his sedentary lifestyle and junk-food diet. Doctors told him he would be on diabetes drugs forever.

Steve decided to move forward by leaping back in time. He adopted the paleolithic diet of our Stone Age ancestors—meats, eggs, fish, veggies and nuts, but no sugars or agricultural starches. Steve lost 80 pounds, stopped needing insulin and other medications, and brought his diabetes under control. He became an advocate for paleolithic eating, and started a blog (www.diabetes-warrior.net).

Steve’s blog became so popular that he started a life-coaching service to give the same advice for a small fee that he had been sharing for free. He also started a free Dear Abby-style advice column, where he would respond to questions sent in by readers. Unfortunately for Steve, it wasn’t long before the state board found out about what he was saying.

The state board became involved after Steve attended a diabetes seminar at a local church. The head of diabetic services at a local hospital advocated the standard high-carb/low-fat diet for diabetics. Steve expressed his opinion that a paleolithic diet is best. Others expressed different views. A few days later, someone filed a complaint with the state board alleging that Steve was offering dietary advice without a license.

It is hard to believe that an American can come under investigation for offering an opinion at a church seminar and have his personal writings examined by a bureaucratic censor wielding a red pen, but that is just what happened. These peculiar circumstances are the result of uncertainty over what occurs when free speech collides with occupational licensing.

For years, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that protecting speech is a central value—perhaps the core value—of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has also said that there are virtually no constitutional limits on the government’s power to restrict liberty through occupational-licensing laws. These principles are in direct conflict in Steve’s case. And North Carolina is not applying the law simply to Steve’s paid life-coaching service, but also to his free advice, whether in his advice column or in private emails and conversations.

As more and more occupations consist primarily of speech, and as the Internet makes it easier for laypeople to share valuable advice, there are going to be more conflicts between free speech and occupational licensing. There is an urgent need for the Supreme Court to settle this debate because over the past generation the intermediate courts of appeal have become less protective of speech in the form of advice even as the Supreme Court has grown more protective both of speech in general and advice in particular.

That is why Steve teamed up with the Institute for Justice and in May of this year brought suit against the North Carolina Board of Dietetics/Nutrition. Steve’s case is on the cutting-edge of free-speech law and aimed squarely at the gap between Supreme Court decisions and those of the lower courts.

We plan to keep Steve and millions of others free to discuss what food to buy at the grocery store, keep the Internet free as a forum for sharing advice and ideas, and keep the cuffs off of Jeanne Phillips, who took over the Dear Abby column from her mom. We’d hate to see her get arrested for practicing psychology without a license.

Jeff Rowes is an IJ senior attorney.

Share

Related Case

IJ client Steve Cooksey

Caveman Blogger Fights for Free Speech and Internet Freedom: Challenging the Government’s Authority to Censor Ordinary Advice

This caveman blogger fought for free speech and Internet freedom.

Also in this Issue

IJ client Doreen Flynn, a single mother of five children from Lewiston, Maine, is a compelling example of the courage and determination parents must exhibit when their children are struck with a deadly blood disease. Three of Doreen’s daughters have Fanconi anemia, a serious genetic disorder whose sufferers often need a bone marrow transplant in their teens. Thanks to IJ’s victory, those needing bone marrow transplants may soon find it easier to secure a match.

Liberty & Law

IJ Wins a Life-Saving Victory

July 30, 2012

Virginia’s CON program regulates whether someone is allowed to open a new medical office or purchase new equipment. IJ client Dr. Mark Monteferrante shouldn’t need the government’s permission to compete.

Liberty & Law

IJ Fights CON Job in Virginia

July 30, 2012

IJ client Frank Taucher

Liberty & Law

IJ Leads the Fight to Protect Occupational Speech from Government Restrictions

July 30, 2012

Liberty & Law

Charity Navigator Ranks IJ Among Most Elite

July 30, 2012

The government should not require teachers like IJ client Lissette Waugh to spend hundreds of hours in a classroom learning skills that have nothing to do with what they teach.

Liberty & Law

Nevada Should Blush Over Makeup Artist Licensing Law

July 30, 2012

Chip Mellor pictured with wife Alison Ling and children Mitch and Sarah.

Liberty & Law

Chip Mellor: 2012 Bradley Prize Winner

July 30, 2012

Our 2012 headquarters summer clerks and interns provided excellent legal research for IJ. They are from left to right, Katie Mclay, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Bryson Smith, Yale University Law School; David Morse, University of Houston; Brad King, Harvard University Law School; Jordan Fischetti, George Mason University School of Law; Andrew Ward, New York University School of Law; Andrew Koehlinger, Hillsdale College; Alex Antonova, University of Virginia School of Law; David Will, Princeton University; Darwyyn Deyo, George Mason University; Akil Alleyne, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law; David Scott, University of Iowa College of Law; Jessica Thompson, University of North Carolina School of Law; Charles Blatz, Manhattanville College; and Eddie Lowe, University of Alabama School of Law.

Liberty & Law

IJ’s Annual Law Student Conference Trains the Next Generation Of Public Interest Advocates

July 30, 2012

Liberty & Law

Monks and Their Supporters Head to Federal Appeals Court in Support of Economic Liberty

July 30, 2012

Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!

Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.