November 11, 2002

Media Advisory

Law enforcement officers should not be engaged in bounty hunting. That is the commonsense idea at the center of a challenge to New Jersey’s civil forfeiture law, which dangerously transforms law enforcement priorities away from the fair and impartial administration of justice and toward the pursuit of property and profit. How? New Jersey prosecutors and police are entitled to keep the money and property confiscated from individuals through the state’s civil forfeiture law, thus giving them a direct financial stake in the outcome of forfeiture efforts.

From 1998 to 2000, New Jersey police and prosecutors collected an astonishing nearly $32 million in property and currency through the application of the civil forfeiture law. Forfeiture funds went to everything from overtime pay to the purchase of automobiles to a golf outing, from office furnishings to expenses at prosecutor conventions in Atlantic City and elsewhere.

Tomorrow (November 12), oral argument will take place in a landmark case that seeks to eliminate New Jersey’s perverse forfeiture incentive scheme, State of New Jersey v. One 1990 Ford Thunderbird. The case is led by perhaps an unlikely crusader, Carol Thomas of Millville in southern New Jersey. Her case arose in 1999 when Thomas’ then 17-year-old son used her Thunderbird without her knowledge and consent to sell marijuana to an undercover officer. Her son was arrested and punished, but that did not end the matter. The State still went after the car by filing a civil forfeiture action because the car was involved in illegal activity. Ironically, at the time of her son’s arrest, Thomas was a seven-year veteran officer with the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office. Thomas has subsequently left the sheriff’s department and decided to fight abusive forfeiture laws.

Last year, the Institute scored a first-round victory in this case when it secured the release of Thomas’ car. The judge allowed her challenge to New Jersey’s unconstitutional profit motive to continue and now that battle moves to center stage at the hearing.

 

 

Share

More on Private Property

Dog sniffing a cardboard box in a warehouse stacked high with wrapped packages

Private Property

Court Says Marion County Must Clearly State What Crime Was Committed Before Taking Money Seized at FedEx Hub

Andrew Wimer · October 20, 2026

Carlos Pena points to a hole in a door at his North Hollywood printing shop, which was destroyed by an LAPD SWAT team in August 2022. The city refused to compensate Carlos.

Private Property

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Los Angeles Business Owner’s Case Seeking Compensation After SWAT Team Destroyed Shop

Andrew Wimer · October 19, 2026

Sidewalk beside a certified wildlife habitat garden in Jeremy Boggess and Kristi Church's front yard

Private Property

Illinois Town Threatens to Destroy Award-Winning Garden, Violating State’s Right-to-Garden Law

Christopher Ingraham · September 21, 2026