Mandatory disclosure for ballot initiative campaigns
This research examines some of the assumptions inherent in discussions of campaign-finance disclosure laws as they relate to ballot issues. Specifically, it tests the theory that mandatory disclosure contributes to “better” (that is, more informed) voters by (a) examining respondents’ support for disclosure, (b) exploring the idea of the “chilling” nature of disclosure (if respondents are less likely to support initiative campaigns in the face of mandatory disclosure), (c) measuring knowledge of disclosure laws and access to disclosed information, and (d) investigating these issues in the context of specific ballot issues.
Suggested Citation: Carpenter, D. M. (2009). Mandatory disclosure for ballot initiative campaigns. Independent Review, 13(4), 567-583.
You can read the full report here.
Related Cases
Commercial Speech | Economic Liberty | First Amendment | Sign Codes
Nebraska Barber Shop Free Speech
Institute for Justice joins lawsuit defending family bar threatened with fines and even jail time for using “barber shop” theme to honor owners’ late father When Mike DiGiacomo and his siblings wanted to remodel…
Commercial Speech | First Amendment
Wisconsin Animal Care
Jim Masterson has been working with animals for almost 30 years. But Wisconsin said he can’t teach without subjecting Jim’s school to an all-encompassing review of everything from Jim’s curriculum to intrusive inquiries into his…
First Amendment | First Amendment Retaliation
Apache County, AZ Retaliation
Fernie Madrid ran for school superintendent in Apache, but he was running against the wife of the County Attorney, Michael Whiting. Whiting used his employees to retaliate against Fernie and bully him out of the…