• Nick Sibilla
    Writer & Legislative Analyst
  • Paul Avelar
    Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice Arizona Office

Untangling Regulations

Natural hair braiding is a beauty practice popular among many African, African-American and immigrant communities in the United States. Braiding is a safe practice because braiders do not use any chemicals, dyes or coloring agents and do not cut hair. Yet as this study makes clear, braiders in many states have to endure hundreds of hours of unnecessary coursework and pay thousands of dollars before they can legally work. That creates an enormous burden for aspiring entrepreneurs.

Untangling Regulations: Natural Hair Braiders Fight Against Irrational Licensing is a survey of braiding laws in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. Across the country, braiding regulations vary dramatically:

  • Eleven states do not license natural hair braiders.
  • In the 39 states and the District of Columbia where braiders are required to obtain a license, the necessary hours range from six in South Carolina to 2,100 in Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota.

The report also ranks these laws based on the number of hours a braider must complete before she can work legally:

  • Twelve states earned an A or A-.
  • Three states earned a B or B+.
  • Washington, D.C. received a C.
  • Ten states got a D.
  • Twenty-four states earned an F.
  • Washington State received an incomplete, pending a recent lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice, because it had previously promised not to regulate braiders but then reversed its position without notice or explanation, leading to the lawsuit.

Related Cases

Cosmetology | Economic Liberty | Fresh Start | Occupational Licensing

Law Denies Women Right to Work Because of Irrelevant Criminal Convictions

A Pennsylvania law prevented Amanda and Courtney from earning an honest living because of unrelated criminal records. After IJ stepped in to defend their rights, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled this law was unconstitutional.