Thanks to federal civil forfeiture laws, the Internal Revenue Service has seized millions of dollars from thousands of Americans’ bank accounts without proof of criminal wrongdoing. The IRS claimed the funds were illegally “structured”—deposited or withdrawn in small amounts to evade federal reporting requirements imposed on banks—and simply took the money. The IRS practice of “seize first, question later” highlights the need for broad reform to federal civil forfeiture laws that impose substantial burdens on property owners and make seizing property—and profiting from it—too easy for law enforcement.
According to IRS data obtained by the Institute for Justice:
- From 2005 to 2012, the IRS seized more than $242 million for suspected structuring violations in more than 2,500 cases, and annual seizures increased fivefold over those eight years.
- At least a third of those cases arose from nothing more than a series of cash transactions under $10,000, with no other criminal activity alleged.
- Four out of five IRS structuring-related forfeitures were civil, not criminal, so the IRS faced a lower evidentiary standard and did not need to secure a conviction to forfeit the cash, and owners had fewer rights in fighting to win it back.
- Owners likely face a long legal battle to win their money back: The average IRS structuring-related forfeiture took nearly a year to complete.
- Nearly half of the money seized by the IRS was not forfeited, raising concerns that the IRS seized more than it could later justify to forfeit the cash.
Civil forfeiture allows the IRS and other law enforcement agencies to take cash and property without charging, let alone convicting, the owner of any crime. The IRS’s track record with structuring seizures is a vivid example of how federal civil forfeiture law stacks the deck against property owners.
Related Cases

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Class Action Challenges FBI’s “Take Now, Explain Never” Forfeitures
Linda Martin's home savings were seized by the FBI. She received a confusing forfeiture notice that didn't clearly say what she did wrong for the government to want to take her money.

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Police seized an innocent woman’s $8,040, and now she is fighting to have her day in court
Cristal Starling runs a mobile food cart in Rochester, New York, to provide for herself and her grandnephew. She dreamed of expanding the business into a food truck, and she saved enough money to do…

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Armored Car Company Sues Federal Law Enforcement and a California Sheriff After Series of Illegal Roadside Seizures
An armored car company sued after a California sheriff teamed up with federal law enforcement to take proceeds from legal cannabis businesses.
In The News
Liberty & Law Article
IJ Turning the Tide on the Outrage That is Civil Forfeiture
Liberty & Law Article
Smooth Landing for Airport Forfeiture Victim
Liberty & Law Article
Transparently Bad
Liberty & Law Article
Our Client Got Her Car Back, But Her Lawsuit Keeps Running
Liberty & Law Article
Seize First, Question Later
Related Reports

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Policing for Profit: Second Edition
Civil forfeiture laws pose some of the greatest threats to property rights in the nation today, too often making it easy and lucrative for law enforcement to take and keep property—regardless of the owner’s guilt…

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Inequitable Justice
This report examines a federal law enforcement practice known as “equitable sharing.” It enables—indeed, encourages—state and local police and prosecutors to circumvent the civil forfeiture laws of their states for financial gain. Civil forfeiture is…

Civil Forfeiture | Private Property
Policing for Profit: First Edition
Civil forfeiture laws represent one of the most serious assaults on private property rights in the nation today. Under civil forfeiture, police and prosecutors can seize your car or other property, sell it and use…