August 1, 2026

One Woman’s Fight Protects Property Owners Across Texas

After five years of litigation, including multiple appeals and a jury trial, Vicki Baker is finally getting compensation after a SWAT team destroyed her home chasing a fugitive.
After five years of litigation, including multiple appeals and a jury trial, Vicki Baker is finally getting compensation after a SWAT team destroyed her home chasing a fugitive.

Six years ago, IJ client Vicki Baker’s life was turned upside down. She was in the process of selling her home in McKinney, Texas, and relocating to Montana for her retirement when she received a disturbing call. An armed fugitive, with a teenage hostage, had barricaded himself inside her McKinney house, and a SWAT team had surrounded it. The fugitive eventually released the girl but refused to come out, so the SWAT team assaulted the house, using tear gas, explosives, and armored personnel carriers. As it turned out, by the time they launched the assault, the fugitive had already died by his own hand. 

The damage was extensive. The police on the scene said that the city would pay for repairs, but when Vicki submitted a claim, the city told her she “wouldn’t see a dime.” Her insurance likewise denied her claim, citing a common exclusion in homeowners’ policies for damage caused by the government.

Vicki and IJ sued the city of McKinney. We argued that when the government destroys private property, even for a legitimate reason like apprehending a dangerous fugitive, innocent owners are entitled to compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as well as a similar provision of the Texas Constitution. Law enforcement is a public good, and the cost should be borne by society as a whole, not unlucky individuals like Vicki. 

Now, after five years of litigation, including multiple appeals and a jury trial, Vicki is finally going to get paid. Although our early win under the U.S. Constitution was eventually vacated by a federal appeals court, we ultimately prevailed under the Texas Constitution. So Vicki will be getting her full jury award of nearly $60,000, plus interest. 

It should not have taken this long. Many cities around the country voluntarily pay claims like Vicki’s as a matter of course. Instead, McKinney spent far more money litigating this case than Vicki’s claim was worth. But there is a silver lining. Cities across Texas are now on notice that property owners are entitled to be compensated in situations like this. 

Indeed, Vicki’s win is already reverberating throughout the Lone Star State. In the past six years, the city of Austin received 135 claims for property damage caused by the police, and it denied every single one. But just a couple of weeks after Vicki’s final victory, Austin announced a new official policy: Going forward, innocent owners will receive compensation when the police damage or destroy their property. 

The timing cannot be a coincidence. Meanwhile, we’re fighting cases similar to Vicki’s on behalf of families in Indiana and North Carolina and a small-business owner in California. 

Most plaintiffs don’t have the resources to fight city hall for over five years, but that’s sometimes what it takes to secure a landmark constitutional ruling that will protect the rights of millions of property owners. IJ will continue pushing this issue until all Americans have the same protections that Texans now enjoy.

Jeffrey Redfern is an IJ senior attorney. 

Share

Related Case

A SWAT team destroyed Vicki Baker's home after a fugitive hid inside. She fought for compensation

Woman Fights for Compensation After House Destroyed by SWAT Team

Police destroyed Vicki Baker’s home while pursuing a fugitive, costing her tens of thousands of dollars and leaving her daughter’s dog with hearing loss. The city refused to pay for the damage it caused. IJ has partnered with Vicki to get the compensation she deserves.

Also in this Issue

Man with gray beard and glasses wearing dark blazer over blue shirt stands in room with wooden furniture and windows

Liberty & Law

A Plain Outlier: North Dakota Prefers Licensed Teachers Over Qualified Ones

August 1, 2026

Two people cover a barber pole with a white cloth while two others watch in a courtyard

Liberty & Law

What’s In A Name? Speakeasies Aren’t Illegal, But In Nebraska, Their Names Can Be

August 1, 2026

Man standing in wooded area with tall grass and pine trees backlit by sunlight

Liberty & Law

A Lot at Stake: IJ Battles Restrictive Zoning

August 1, 2026

Man in black shirt and cap standing beside red dumpster truck painted with American flag design

Liberty & Law

Taking Out The Trash: Texas Entrepreneur Fights City’s Dumpster Monopoly

August 1, 2026

Man in navy polo shirt standing beside filing cabinets with one drawer open in a bright office with window blinds

Liberty & Law

IJ Fights Pennsylvania’s Costly “Ghost Office” Requirement

August 1, 2026

Natural gas drilling facilities and pumpjacks across rolling grasslands at sunset in North Dakota

Liberty & Law

IJ Takes North Dakota Ranchers’ Pipeline Fight To The Supreme Court

August 1, 2026

Liberty & Law

A Victory For Fresh Starts In The Bluegrass State

August 1, 2026

Garden plot with rows of vegetables behind wire fencing, low greenhouse frame in center, residential houses in background

Liberty & Law

Victory! An Illinois City Lets Garden Grow

August 1, 2026

Scattered U.S. currency bills in various denominations on a white marble surface

Liberty & Law

Friends Of The Court, Foes Of Financially Driven “Justice”

August 1, 2026

Man in gray suit and blue tie speaks outdoors, flanked by people in black t-shirts with barbershop logos and others in business attire

Liberty & Law

IJ Makes Headlines

August 1, 2026

Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!

Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.