December 17, 2024

Lawsuit Against Wilmington’s Predatory Impound Practices Ends after City Makes Reforms

Institute for Justice calls new towing procedures a model for cities seeking fair enforcement.

WILMINGTON, Del.— Wilmington, Delaware’s towing and impound practices were among the most predatory in the nation, enabling private tow companies to profit off innocent drivers. A lawsuit from city residents and the Institute for Justice (IJ), convinced the city to work with IJ to end a system that allowed companies to scrap and keep cars and replace it with a system that is a model of fairness. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware approved the settlement this morning, bringing the lawsuit to an end.

The reforms include repeated notice of violations, easy payment plans for parking tickets, and convenient hearings. Most importantly, even if someone does have their car towed, they will be able to go get it back without being forced to pay, so long as they either go to the hearing or enter into the easy payment plan.

“Wilmington’s impound reforms are a model that other cities should follow if they want to treat residents fairly,” said IJ Attorney Will Aronin. “We recognize that cities need to be able to enforce their parking rules. But if somebody can’t afford to pay a ticket, the solution is to put them on a payment plan, not take their car.”

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Ameera Shaheed and Earl Dickerson, two Wilmington residents whose vehicles were towed, impounded, and ultimately scrapped by the city’s private towing contractors. In addition to reforming its towing procedures, the city agreed to compensate both plaintiffs for the loss of their cars.

“Wilmington treated so many of us unfairly, but the city has done the right thing and created a fair impound system,” said Ameera. “I’m glad that our suit changed things for the better for everyone in the city. I hope that other Americans can also benefit from their cities following Wilmington.”

“Parking enforcement across the country is broken,” said IJ Senior Attorney Rob Johnson, “Rather than accept the status quo, we were able to work with the city here in Wilmington to reimagine what parking enforcement could look like, and we’re proud of the result.”

IJ defends property rights across the country, working to ensure that government fines and fees systems comply with the Constitution. An IJ lawsuit against Chicago over its predatory impound practices is expected to go to trial next year. IJ is also defending a New York City man from unreviewable fines and a Florida woman from fines totaling more than $100,000 for how she parked in her own driveway.  

John Shaw of Shaw Keller, LLP worked with IJ as Delaware counsel in this case and played an important role in securing this victory.

Share

More on Private Property

construction worker with toolbelt

Private Property

US Citizen and Construction Worker Wins First Round in His Lawsuit Over Repeated Unconstitutional Detentions

Andrew Wimer · September 3, 2026

Charles and Eli Copley hold hands walking a wooded trail on their Roxbury, Connecticut property

Private Property

Connecticut Couple Demands Clarity After Town Threatens to Ban Them From Allowing Hikers on Their Property

Dan King · August 27, 2026

Leonard Hoffmann is a North Dakota property owner fighting for fair compensation for property taken by a pipeline company through eminent domain.

Private Property

Support Pours in for Ranchers’ Supreme Court Battle with Pipeline Company Wielding Eminent Domain Power

Andrew Wimer · August 26, 2026