December 17, 2024

Lawsuit Against Wilmington’s Predatory Impound Practices Ends after City Makes Reforms

Institute for Justice calls new towing procedures a model for cities seeking fair enforcement.

WILMINGTON, Del.— Wilmington, Delaware’s towing and impound practices were among the most predatory in the nation, enabling private tow companies to profit off innocent drivers. A lawsuit from city residents and the Institute for Justice (IJ), convinced the city to work with IJ to end a system that allowed companies to scrap and keep cars and replace it with a system that is a model of fairness. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware approved the settlement this morning, bringing the lawsuit to an end.

The reforms include repeated notice of violations, easy payment plans for parking tickets, and convenient hearings. Most importantly, even if someone does have their car towed, they will be able to go get it back without being forced to pay, so long as they either go to the hearing or enter into the easy payment plan.

“Wilmington’s impound reforms are a model that other cities should follow if they want to treat residents fairly,” said IJ Attorney Will Aronin. “We recognize that cities need to be able to enforce their parking rules. But if somebody can’t afford to pay a ticket, the solution is to put them on a payment plan, not take their car.”

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Ameera Shaheed and Earl Dickerson, two Wilmington residents whose vehicles were towed, impounded, and ultimately scrapped by the city’s private towing contractors. In addition to reforming its towing procedures, the city agreed to compensate both plaintiffs for the loss of their cars.

“Wilmington treated so many of us unfairly, but the city has done the right thing and created a fair impound system,” said Ameera. “I’m glad that our suit changed things for the better for everyone in the city. I hope that other Americans can also benefit from their cities following Wilmington.”

“Parking enforcement across the country is broken,” said IJ Senior Attorney Rob Johnson, “Rather than accept the status quo, we were able to work with the city here in Wilmington to reimagine what parking enforcement could look like, and we’re proud of the result.”

IJ defends property rights across the country, working to ensure that government fines and fees systems comply with the Constitution. An IJ lawsuit against Chicago over its predatory impound practices is expected to go to trial next year. IJ is also defending a New York City man from unreviewable fines and a Florida woman from fines totaling more than $100,000 for how she parked in her own driveway.  

John Shaw of Shaw Keller, LLP worked with IJ as Delaware counsel in this case and played an important role in securing this victory.

Share

More on Private Property

Joe Marino at his parent's home in New Jersey. His case against courts where bureaucrats acts as prosecutor, judge, and jury is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Private Property

Former Attorneys General, Business Associations, and Former Department of Labor Leaders Support Family Farm’s Supreme Court Case

Andrew Wimer · August 5, 2026

Leo Feler stands outside his home in Chicago, which was warrantlessly raided by Customs and Border Protection officers in October 2025.

Private Property

Chicago Homeowner Sues Federal Government After Warrantless Raid by Immigration Agents

Dan King · July 28, 2026

Steve Camburn and his tenants challenged Pottstown, Pennsylvania's unconstitutional rental inspection program.

Private Property

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over Pottstown’s Rental Inspection Ordinance

Dan King · June 24, 2026