Published
  • David Warren, Ph.D.
    Former Senior Research Analyst
  • Jason Tiezzi
    Data Scientist
  • Mindy Menjou
    Assistant Director of Strategic Research

In the course of their duties, law enforcement officers sometimes damage property belonging to innocent individuals. The damage could be as minor as a fence broken during a foot chase or as extensive as the destruction of a home where a suspect has barricaded himself. In either case, after the damage is done, the question becomes who pays the bill: the unlucky property owner or the government?

This is the first nationwide study to quantify how often property owners seek compensation from local governments for damage caused by law enforcement—and how often governments honor those requests. Our results show local governments frequently refuse to compensate property owners, effectively turning public benefits into private burdens—even though they could easily afford to make worthy owners whole.

Additional Downloads

Key Findings

$1,260

The median value of a property damage claim in our data was $1,260—more than most Americans have in their emergency funds.

60% / 41%

Municipalities denied 60% of all claims with known outcomes and 41% of claims where the property owners were innocent bystanders.

$6,500

If municipalities paid every claim in our dataset, the average cost would have been only about $6,500 a year—a tiny fraction of their annual spending.

Press Release

Check out this report's press release and contact our media team member for additional information.

Dan King
Assistant Director of Media Relations
[email protected]

Press Release

New Study Lands as Supreme Court Weighs Whether Cities Must Pay for Property Destroyed by Police 

  • Dan King
  • September 15, 2026

ARLINGTON, Va.—A new report, “Public Benefit, Private Burden,” released today by the Institute for Justice (IJ), sheds light on an important question that the United […]

Related Cases