William R. Maurer

Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice Washington Office

William R. Maurer is the Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice Washington office (IJ-WA), which he joined in November 2002.  IJ-WA engages in constitutional litigation in the areas of economic liberty, private property rights, educational choice, freedom of speech, and other vital liberties secured by the U.S. and Washington Constitutions.

Maurer has led challenges to a number of governmental abuses and become a nationally recognized litigator on behalf of free speech. Maurer was the lead attorney in a challenge to Arizona’s punitive campaign financing regime, Arizona Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, a case he argued and won before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011. He successfully fought governmental efforts to regulate pro bono representation of political campaigns in federal civil rights actions as campaign contributions, as well as an effort to classify on-air radio commentary as a reportable contribution under the state’s campaign finance law. He served as lead attorney on IJ-WA’s successful challenge before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to a City of Redmond ordinance that banned the use of portable signs for commercial businesses while allowing them for politicians and real estate companies. He regularly writes, teaches and testifies before legislatures on free speech issues.

In addition to his First Amendment work, Maurer has worked to prevent the government from using the power of eminent domain for private gain. He has testified on eminent domain issues in a number of state legislatures and, in 2006, the Washington Policy Center published his Policy Brief, A False Sense of Security: The Potential For Eminent Domain Abuse in Washington State. He was a member of Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna’s Eminent Domain Task Force, which reviewed Washington’s eminent domain laws and produced a comprehensive report and proposed significant reform legislation.

Maurer’s work has been covered in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Mother Jones, The Wall Street Journal, and in all major Washington papers. He has been named a “Washington Superlawyer” by Washington Law & Politics Magazine. He is an Adjunct Scholar and Research Advisory Board member at the Washington Policy Center. Maurer is an author of chapters in legal reference works on both Washington’s Public Records Act and the interplay between administrative law and the Civil Rights Act.

Prior to joining IJ-WA, Maurer clerked for Washington Supreme Court Justice Richard Sanders and Justice Victoria Lederberg of the Rhode Island Supreme Court, and then practiced law at Perkins Coie LLP. Maurer received his law degree in 1994 from the University of Wisconsin – Madison, where he was an articles editor of the Wisconsin Law Review. He received his undergraduate degree in Political Studies from Bard College in 1989.

Related Cases

Fines and Fees | Private Property

New York Permit Fines

Joe Corsini keeps a pigeon coop on the roof of his home, like many other New Yorkers. The city’s Department of Buildings saddled him with thousands of dollars in fines for not having a license…

Fines and Fees | Private Property

Memphis Environmental Court

When a court proceeding may result in a person losing their home, the U.S. Constitution demands a fair process with rigorous safeguards against erroneous deprivation. But the process is Shelby County, Tennessee, is anything but…

Clients

Fines and Fees | Private Property

New Orleans Ankle Monitors

Judges must be impartial when deciding to deprive a person of his or her property. Unfortunately, one judge in New Orleans has been ordering individuals to wear an ankle monitor from a company in which…

See More

Related Research & Reports

The Regulation of Grassroots Lobbying

First Amendment

The Regulation of Grassroots Lobbying

President Obama’s domestic policies have generated opposition among many in the general public and mobilized previously uninvolved citizens. This opposition has manifested itself in public rallies, “tea party” protests, and spirited feedback at town hall…

Davis v. FEC and the Constitutionality of “Clean Elections” Systems

First Amendment

Davis v. FEC and the Constitutionality of “Clean Elections” Systems

In a “clean elections” system, taxpayer funded candidates must agree to limit their campaign spending. Imposing limits on campaign spending for candidates who forego taxpayer dollars and instead run traditional campaigns would be unconstitutional. Most…

A False Sense of Security

Eminent Domain | Private Property

A False Sense of Security

Washington state law is rife with opportunities for eminent domain abuse.

See More

Related Amicus Briefs

Yes v. Savage

Yes v. Savage

US Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

See More

Related News, Articles & Publications

See More