IJ Issue
Unjust Proceedings
IJ fights to ensure that individuals targeted for fines, forfeitures, or other government penalties get a fair trial in a real court.
When the government seeks to impose punishment, the judicial system is designed to stand as a barrier between the government’s power and the individual. Punishment can be imposed only after a fair trial before an independent judge and jury.
Particularly when it comes to fines, penalties, and other monetary liability, however, the government increasingly imposes punishment through kangaroo courts that fall short of that ideal. At the federal level, this takes the form of so-called “administrative courts,” where prosecutors and judges are both employed by the same administrative agency. At the state and local level, governments use an even broader array of special courts and procedures to impose fines and penalties—and even take or destroy property—without notice or a fair trial.
The Institute for Justice litigates to protect your right to a real day in court. IJ represents individuals and businesses who have been forced to defend themselves in biased administrative courts. Currently, for example, IJ is at the U.S. Supreme Court in Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards representing a family farm that was subjected to over half a million dollars in fines and other liability in an agency proceeding where the only judge was an agency bureaucrat.
Beyond federal administrative courts, IJ challenges other regimes that similarly strip people of vital procedural protections. Among them: systems that allow the government to impose punishments through special procedures that circumvent normal judicial processes; local “environmental” courts that fine for property code violations without following rules of evidence, keeping written records, or following other just procedures; and schemes that force individuals to pay massive court costs that dwarf the penalties at issue—creating a financial incentive to give up, rather than mount a defense.
If courts are not independent, or do not follow fair procedures, they cannot serve their critical role protecting individual liberty from overreach by other branches of government.
Rule of Law Issues
Fines and Fees
IJ fights to stop taxation by citation and policing for profit.
Project on Immunity and Accountability
IJ combats legal doctrines that stand in the way of meaningful accountability for government mistakes and misconduct.
Unjust Proceedings
IJ fights to ensure that individuals targeted for fines, forfeitures, or other government penalties get a fair trial in a real court.
Warrantless Surveillance
IJ fights government surveillance programs that gather private information about the ordinary activities of innocent people.
Unjust Proceedings Cases
Rule of Law | Unjust Proceedings
Small Kentucky Farm Fights Federal Government for a Fair Trial
David and Debbie Ross of Triple R Farms are fighting for their constitutional right to a real court and jury trial.
Rule of Law | Unjust Proceedings
Property Owner Sues Macon-Bibb County Over Unconstitutional Home Demolition Practice
Macon-Bibb County has demolished hundreds of homes in a secret process. One homeowner, whose house was demolished while he was actively renovating it, is fighting back.
Rule of Law | Unjust Proceedings
Lawsuit from Oklahoma Small Business Challenges Administrative Courts Handing Down Ruinous Fines
A small masonry business challenges the constitutionality of agency courts that impose devastating fines without a jury trial or independent court.
Rule of Law | Unjust Proceedings
Lawsuit Challenges Department of Labor’s Use of Administrative Law Judges to Hand Down Ruinous Fines
When the Department of Labor fined Chuck Saine over $50,000, the agency’s own employees served as prosecutor, judge, and jury.
Rule of Law | Unjust Proceedings
Family Farm Facing Ruinous Fines Sues Agency that Acts as Prosecutor, Judge and Jury
Family Farm Facing Ruinous Fines Sues Agency that Acts as Prosecutor, Judge and Jury
Unjust Proceedings News
Former Attorneys General, Business Associations, and Former Department of Labor Leaders Support Family Farm’s Supreme Court Case
ARLINGTON, Va.—In its fall term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Department of Labor’s agency court system. New Jersey family farm Sun Valley Orchards…
Supreme Court to Hear Family Farm’s Case Challenging Agency Court that Acts as Prosecutor, Judge and Jury
WASHINGTON—The U.S. Supreme Court will consider a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of courts where agency employees serve as prosecutor, judge, and jury. The government petitioned for certiorari after a panel of…
Maryland Small Business Will Appeal After District Court Affirms Department of Labor Courts That Hand Down Ruinous Fines
WASHINGTON—The Institute for Justice (IJ) will appeal on behalf of C.S. Lawn & Landscaping, a Maryland small business owned by Chuck Saine, after a federal district court upheld the Department…