Home » Reports » Policing for Profit » Policing for Profit: Vermont

Vermont earns a C for its civil forfeiture laws:

  • Higher bar to forfeit property and conviction required
  • Poor protections for innocent third-party property owners
  • 45% of forfeiture proceeds go to law enforcement

State Forfeiture Laws

In 2015, Vermont took one step forward and two steps back with its civil forfeiture laws, raising the government’s standard of proof to forfeit property while also creating a new incentive for law enforcement agencies to police for profit. Vermont’s laws, which earn a C grade, now require the government to provide clear and convincing evidence tying property to an owner’s conviction in criminal court before the property may be forfeited. Unfortunately, the General Assembly did not reform Vermont’s innocent owner burden—a third-party owner must still prove that she was not involved in the illegal use of her property in order to recover it. Last but not least, law enforcement can now retain 45 percent of forfeiture proceeds. Although this incentive is much lower than those in most other states, it is considerably worse than what Vermont had before: a statute mandating that all forfeiture proceeds be delivered to the state treasurer rather than to law enforcement coffers.

Vermont law requires law enforcement agencies to file reports of their controlled substances forfeitures with the state treasurer. When the Institute for Justice submitted a Vermont Public Records Law request to the Office of the State Treasurer in order to obtain forfeiture reports from 2009 to 2014, the treasurer’s office replied: “No such records, reports, or funds were sent to the Office of the State Treasurer during those years.” It was unclear at press time whether agencies failed to report because no forfeitures had occurred under state law or because agencies were out of compliance with reporting requirements.

Show State Law Sources
Standard of proof

Clear and convincing evidence and a criminal conviction are required for civil forfeiture.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, §§ 4243(a), (c), 4244(e).

Innocent owner burden


Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4244(d).

Profit incentive

45 percent.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4247(b)(1).

Reporting requirements

Agencies are required to submit reports of drug-related forfeitures to the state treasurer.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit 18, § 4248.

Other sources

Email correspondence between Angela C. Erickson of the Institute for Justice and Tim Lueders-Dumont, public records officer in the Vermont Office of the State Treasurer (2015, June 15).

State Forfeiture Data

No data available. Agencies are required to track and report their controlled substances forfeitures to the Office of the State Treasurer, but no such reports were received by that office between 2009 and 2014.

Vermont ranks 15th for federal forfeiture, with over $13 million in Department of Justice equitable sharing proceeds from 2000 to 2013.

Federal Equitable Sharing

Vermont ranks 15th in a nationwide comparison of law enforcement agencies’ participation in the Department of Justice’s equitable sharing program. Between 2000 and 2013, agencies received more than $13 million in DOJ equitable sharing proceeds, averaging nearly $929,000 per calendar year. Although 57 percent of assets seized were taken through adoptive forfeitures, 70 percent of proceeds received resulted from joint task forces and investigations—equitable sharing practices left largely intact by the 2015 DOJ policy change. Vermont agencies also received more than $4.2 million from the Treasury Department’s equitable sharing program, an average of over $302,000 per fiscal year.

View Local Law Enforcement Data
(calendar years)
(fiscal years)
2000 $501,223 $68,000
2001 $884,229 $0
2002 $786,808 $0
2003 $945,358 $0
2004 $1,024,029 $3,302,000
2005 $1,289,909 $90,000
2006 $1,099,626 $34,000
2007 $927,044 $36,000
2008 $1,030,892 $123,000
2009 $724,628 $225,000
2010 $1,110,274 $209,000
2011 $973,688 $18,000
2012 $472,794 $33,000
2013 $1,231,963 $95,000
Total $13,002,463 $4,233,000
Average Per Year $928,747 $302,357

DOJ Equitable Sharing,
Adoptive vs. Joint, 2000-2013

Joint Task Forces and Investigations

DOJ Equitable Sharing Proceeds, 2000-2013

Sources: Institute for Justice analysis of DOJ forfeiture data obtained by FOIA; Treasury Forfeiture Fund Accountability Reports. Data include civil and criminal forfeitures. Because DOJ figures represent calendar years and Treasury figures cover fiscal years, they cannot be added.

Sign up to receive IJ's biweekly digital magazine, Liberty & Law along with breaking updates about our fight to protect the rights of all Americans.