Minnesota earns a D for its civil forfeiture laws

Standard of Proof

Higher bar to forfeit in limited cases: Weak conviction provision falls short of criminal forfeiture and applies only to judicial forfeitures. For property worth less than $50,000, the provision requires an owner to contest forfeiture, putting the burden on owners to engage in a costly legal battle and making it easy for the government to forfeit without a conviction. It does not require conviction of the owner, only of “a person,” and it does not apply if the person has agreed to help investigators to avoid criminal charges. Once the conviction provision is satisfied, property must be linked to the crime by clear and convincing evidence.

Innocent Owner Burden

Poor protections for the innocent: Third-party owners must prove their own innocence to recover seized property.

Financial Incentive

Large profit incentive: In general, 90% of forfeiture proceeds go to law enforcement; 60% in cases involving prostitution or human trafficking; 100% in DWI cases.

  • None.

Recommendations

  • End civil forfeiture
  • Direct all forfeiture proceeds to a non-law enforcement fund
  • Strengthen protections for innocent third-party owners
  • Close the equitable sharing loophole
  • Strengthen transparency and accountability requirements
Download PDF View Report

What happens after personal property is seized in Minnesota?*

Under Minnesota law, the government’s, owners’, and court deadlines leading to a judicial hearing add up to 210 days, but the deadline for providing notice can be extended and any criminal proceedings may add to the wait. While you wait, the government has your property, but you can try to get it back while the case continues by posting a bond equal to the property’s retail value or, for a vehicle, surrendering title. 

State and Federal Forfeiture Proceeds, 2000–2023

At least $203 million in state and federal forfeiture revenue

Year Minnesota Forfeiture Revenues Dept. of Justice Equitable Sharing Proceeds Treasury Equitable Sharing Proceeds Total
2000 $1,527,765 $1,046,751 $89,000 $2,663,516
2001 $1,432,526 $1,348,423 $19,000 $2,799,949
2002 $1,705,349 $1,810,187 $2,000 $3,517,536
2003 $2,941,670 $1,133,648 $24,000 $4,099,318
2004 $3,476,866 $1,369,123 $7,000 $4,852,989
2005 $4,945,153 $1,930,861 $0 $6,876,014
2006 $4,484,783 $1,498,393 $434,000 $6,417,176
2007 $5,338,925 $1,960,561 $46,000 $7,345,486
2008 $4,052,661 $2,436,864 $7,000 $6,496,525
2009 $5,090,004 $3,020,632 $71,000 $8,181,636
2010 $3,961,368 $2,758,675 $235,000 $6,955,043
2011 $8,691,336 $1,929,775 $192,000 $10,813,111
2012 $8,830,564 $2,299,709 $81,000 $11,211,273
2013 $9,077,684 $1,802,910 $457,000 $11,337,594
2014 $9,849,772 $1,296,529 $555,000 $11,701,301
2015 $9,462,258 $2,155,604 $290,000 $11,907,862
2016 $9,271,242 $860,280 $48,000 $10,179,522
2017 $8,835,279 $2,106,285 $2,673,000 $13,614,564
2018 $10,045,669 $958,392 $30,000 $11,034,061
2019 $9,113,429 $1,863,220 $1,434,000 $12,410,649
2020 $7,064,855 $2,537,103 $864,000 $10,465,958
2021 $9,624,717 $841,233 $577,000 $11,042,950
2022 $7,686,711 $1,647,146 $336,000 $9,669,857
2023 $4,918,315 $2,696,193 $120,000 $7,734,508
Totals $151,428,901 $43,308,497 $8,591,000 $203,328,398

Federal Equitable Sharing

Minnesota does not prevent state and local law enforcement agencies from using the federal equitable sharing program to circumvent state forfeiture law. Since 2000, Minnesota agencies have generated nearly $52 million in equitable sharing proceeds from the departments of Justice and the Treasury. And on average from 2019 to 2023, more than 85 Minnesota agencies, or an estimated 22% of all law enforcement agencies in the state, were certified for the program.

Forfeitures Under Minnesota Law: Key Facts

Median Value

$1,038

From 2019 to 2023, half of Minnesota’s currency forfeitures were worth less than $1,038.

Property Types

From 2019 to 2023, nearly 60% of Minnesota’s forfeitures were of vehicles.

Proceeding Types

From 2022 to 2023, at least 82% of Minnesota’s forfeitures were initiated under administrative, not judicial, forfeiture proceedings.

Contested Forfeitures

In 2023, only 15% of forfeitures were contested.

Forfeiture Transparency and Accountability Report Card

Tracking Seized Property
B
Statewide Forfeiture Reports
A
Penalties for Failure to File a Report
F
Accounting for Forfeiture Fund Spending
A
Accessibility of Forfeiture Records
A
Financial Audits of Forfeiture Accounts
F
Data Notes

Statewide, property-level forfeiture data were obtained from the state auditor via download from its website and public records requests. Revenues for 2019–2023 represent the value of forfeited currency after any returns to owners and property sold (including any bought back by owners) in a calendar year and do not include the value of property retained or forwarded to other agencies, making them underestimates. Earlier years use a slightly different methodology that may result in small differences over time. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports. Due to differences in reporting and accounting practices, figures may not match aggregate numbers produced by the state or cover the same 12-month period as the federal data. The number of certified agencies was computed using the approved Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification requests submitted by police, sheriff, and other local law enforcement agencies. The percentage of certified agencies was computed using that number and the total number of agencies reported in the 2018 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies.

Legal Sources

Standard of proof: Weak conviction provision does not require conviction of an owner, but only of “a person”—and only for forfeitures of property worth less than $50,000 and only when the owner files a claim. The provision does not apply if the government obtains “[a] person’s agreement to provide information” in exchange for a dropped charge. After the conviction provision is satisfied, property must be linked to the crime by clear and convincing evidence.

Minn. Stat. §§ 609.5314, subd. 2–3, 609.531, subd. 6a(b), 6a(d).

Innocent owner burden: Owner.

Minn. Stat. § 609.5311, subd. 3(d); Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency, 728 N.W.2d 510, 519–20 & n.6 (Minn. 2007); Blanche v. 1995 Pontiac Grand Prix, 599 N.W.2d 161, 167 (Minn. 1999); see also Minn. Stat. §§ 609.5314, subd. 1a(f)–(h), 169A.63, subds. 7a(d), (f)–(h), 9(e).

Financial incentive: 90% in general; 60% in cases involving prostitution or human trafficking; 100% in DWI cases.

Minn. Stat. §§ 609.5315, subds. 5–5c, 169A.63, subd. 10(b).

Process: Minn. Stat. §§ 609.531–.5319 (forfeiture procedure).