North Carolina earns a B+ for its civil forfeiture laws

Standard of Proof

Highest bar to forfeit in most cases: In general, North Carolina has only criminal forfeiture. However, prosecutors can pursue civil forfeiture in racketeering cases, where they must prove by preponderance of the evidence that property is connected to a crime.

Innocent Owner Burden

Poor protections for the innocent: In racketeering cases, third-party owners must prove their own innocence to recover seized property.

Financial Incentive

No profit incentive: All forfeiture proceeds go to fund schools.

  • None.

Recommendations

  • End civil forfeiture in all cases
  • Strengthen protections for innocent third-party owners
  • Close the equitable sharing loophole
  • Adopt strong transparency and accountability requirements
Download PDF View Report

What happens after personal property is seized in North Carolina? 

Under North Carolina’s drug forfeiture law, the government can generally pursue only criminal forfeiture, not civil forfeiture.* Forfeiture occurs as part of the criminal proceedings against a defendant, and property can be forfeited only if the defendant is convicted. While you wait for criminal proceedings to conclude, the government has your property, although the court has jurisdiction to return vehicles to innocent owner claimants.  

State and Federal Forfeiture Proceeds, 2000–2023

At least $364 million in federal forfeiture revenue

Year North Carolina Forfeiture Revenues Dept. of Justice Equitable Sharing Proceeds Treasury Equitable Sharing Proceeds Total
2000 None Reported $7,125,291 $1,018,000 $8,143,291
2001 None Reported $6,808,539 $754,000 $7,562,539
2002 None Reported $4,581,800 $1,632,000 $6,213,800
2003 None Reported $9,480,431 $899,000 $10,379,431
2004 None Reported $8,536,628 $720,000 $9,256,628
2005 None Reported $10,121,517 $3,802,000 $13,923,517
2006 None Reported $10,817,405 $2,675,000 $13,492,405
2007 None Reported $20,920,094 $2,734,000 $23,654,094
2008 None Reported $17,964,512 $6,888,000 $24,852,512
2009 None Reported $15,445,754 $7,081,000 $22,526,754
2010 None Reported $10,600,785 $3,276,000 $13,876,785
2011 None Reported $10,603,162 $2,761,000 $13,364,162
2012 None Reported $15,563,496 $4,108,000 $19,671,496
2013 None Reported $12,763,130 $5,002,000 $17,765,130
2014 None Reported $10,805,901 $5,736,000 $16,541,901
2015 None Reported $11,883,462 $3,651,000 $15,534,462
2016 None Reported $8,709,152 $5,480,000 $14,189,152
2017 None Reported $9,256,927 $1,915,000 $11,171,927
2018 None Reported $17,116,834 $2,237,000 $19,353,834
2019 None Reported $11,277,342 $1,019,000 $12,296,342
2020 None Reported $6,613,196 $5,467,000 $12,080,196
2021 None Reported $5,016,143 $6,781,000 $11,797,143
2022 None Reported $17,758,457 $7,625,000 $25,383,457
2023 None Reported $15,996,737 $5,431,000 $21,427,737
Totals None Reported $275,766,695 $88,692,000 $364,458,695

Federal Equitable Sharing

North Carolina does not prevent state and local law enforcement agencies from using the federal equitable sharing program to circumvent state forfeiture law. Since 2000, North Carolina agencies have generated more than $364 million in equitable sharing proceeds from the departments of Justice and the Treasury. And on average from 2019 to 2023, more than 280 North Carolina agencies, or an estimated 57% of all law enforcement agencies in the state, were certified for the program.

Forfeitures Under North Carolina Law: Key Facts

Median Value

UNKNOWN

North Carolina says it does not conduct forfeitures under state law.

Property Types

UNKNOWN

North Carolina says it does not conduct forfeitures under state law.

Proceeding Types

UNKNOWN

North Carolina says it does not conduct forfeitures under state law.

Civil forfeiture is available in racketeering cases.

Forfeiture Transparency and Accountability Report Card

Tracking Seized Property
F
Statewide Forfeiture Reports
F
Penalties for Failure to File a Report
Incomplete
Accounting for Forfeiture Fund Spending
N/A
Accessibility of Forfeiture Records
F
Financial Audits of Forfeiture Accounts
N/A
Data Notes

According to the North Carolina Department of Revenue, the state does not conduct forfeitures under state law. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports. The number of certified agencies was computed using the approved Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification requests submitted by police, sheriff, and other local law enforcement agencies. The percentage of certified agencies was computed using that number and the total number of agencies reported in the 2018 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies.

Legal Sources

Standard of proof: In general, forfeiture requires a criminal conviction. However, civil forfeiture is available in racketeering cases, which are governed by a preponderance of the evidence standard.

N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 75D-5, 90-112; State ex rel. Thornburg v. $52,029, 378 S.E.2d 1, 3–5 (N.C. 1989); State v. Johnson, 478 S.E.2d 16, 25 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996).

Innocent owner burden: Owner. In racketeering cases, the only context in which civil forfeiture is available, the owner bears the burden of proof.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75D-5(i); State ex rel. Thornburg v. 1907 N. Main St., 384 S.E.2d 585, 586–87 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989).

Financial incentive: No financial incentive. All forfeiture proceeds go to public schools.

N.C. Const. art. IX, § 7; State ex rel. Thornburg v. 532 B St., 432 S.E.2d 684, 686–87 (N.C. 1993).

Process: N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 90-112 (criminal forfeiture—drugs), -112.1 (remission or mitigation); see also id. § 75D-5 (civil forfeiture—racketeering).