Vermont earns a C- for its civil forfeiture laws

Standard of Proof

Higher bar to forfeit in limited cases: Weak conviction provision falls short of criminal forfeiture. It does not require conviction of the owner, only of “a person,” and it does not apply if the person has agreed to forfeiture to avoid criminal charges. Once the conviction provision is satisfied, property must be linked to the crime by clear and convincing evidence.

Innocent Owner Burden

Poor protections for the innocent: Third-party owners must prove their own innocence to recover seized property.

Financial Incentive

Large profit incentive: 45% of forfeiture proceeds go to law enforcement.

  • 2022 (H 533): Created a “Property Seizure and Forfeiture Working Group” to study the state’s seizure and forfeiture processes.
  • 2024 (H 878): Required the Department of Public Safety to propose options for improving seizure and forfeiture transparency in the state.

Recommendations

  • End civil forfeiture
  • Direct all forfeiture proceeds to a non-law enforcement fund
  • Strengthen protections for innocent third-party owners
  • Close the equitable sharing loophole
  • Strengthen transparency and accountability requirements
Download PDF View Report

What happens after personal property is seized in Vermont? 

Under Vermont law, prosecutors’, owners’, and court deadlines leading to a judicial hearing add up to 210 days, but there is no deadline for obtaining the seizure order and the deadline for serving the complaint can be extended; any criminal proceedings may also add to the wait. While you wait, the government has your property, and you have no way to seek its return.  

State and Federal Forfeiture Proceeds, 2000–2023

At least $18 million in federal forfeiture revenue

Year Vermont Forfeiture Revenues Dept. of Justice Equitable Sharing Proceeds Treasury Equitable Sharing Proceeds Total
2000 Unknown $488,454 $68,000 $556,454
2001 Unknown $824,938 $0 $824,938
2002 Unknown $701,553 $0 $701,553
2003 Unknown $956,841 $0 $956,841
2004 Unknown $919,259 $90,000 $1,009,259
2005 Unknown $1,023,538 $90,000 $1,113,538
2006 Unknown $978,247 $34,000 $1,012,247
2007 Unknown $842,834 $36,000 $878,834
2008 Unknown $995,851 $123,000 $1,118,851
2009 Unknown $607,576 $225,000 $832,576
2010 Unknown $1,620,842 $209,000 $1,829,842
2011 Unknown $520,559 $18,000 $538,559
2012 Unknown $935,429 $33,000 $968,429
2013 Unknown $1,060,974 $95,000 $1,155,974
2014 Unknown $525,190 $148,000 $673,190
2015 Unknown $652,237 $110,000 $762,237
2016 Unknown $446,981 $8,000 $454,981
2017 Unknown $273,269 $7,000 $280,269
2018 Unknown $410,337 $0 $410,337
2019 Unknown $381,706 $87,000 $468,706
2020 Unknown $232,690 $43,000 $275,690
2021 Unknown $351,965 $9,000 $360,965
2022 Unknown $114,658 $223,000 $337,658
2023 Unknown $600,343 $104,000 $704,343
Totals Unknown $16,466,271 $1,760,000 $18,226,271

Federal Equitable Sharing

Vermont does not prevent state and local law enforcement agencies from using the federal equitable sharing program to circumvent state forfeiture law. Since 2000, Vermont agencies have generated more than $18 million in equitable sharing proceeds from the departments of Justice and the Treasury. And on average from 2019 to 2023, 38 Vermont agencies, or an estimated 55% of all law enforcement agencies in the state, were certified for the program.

Forfeitures Under Vermont Law: Key Facts

Median Value

UNKNOWN

Vermont does not report property-level data necessary to calculate median forfeiture value.

Property Types

UNKNOWN

Vermont does not report the types of property forfeited.

Proceeding Types

UNKNOWN

Vermont does not report whether forfeitures are processed under civil or criminal forfeiture law.

Additional Findings

UNKNOWN

Agencies do not provide detailed data on seized or forfeited property, resulting in limited transparency into forfeiture activity in the state.

Forfeiture Transparency and Accountability Report Card

Tracking Seized Property
A-
Statewide Forfeiture Reports
F
Penalties for Failure to File a Report
F
Accounting for Forfeiture Fund Spending
F
Accessibility of Forfeiture Records
D
Financial Audits of Forfeiture Accounts
F
Data Notes

Records obtained from the state treasurer were sparse and unusable. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports. The number of certified agencies was computed using the approved Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification requests submitted by police, sheriff, and other local law enforcement agencies. The percentage of certified agencies was computed using that number and the total number of agencies reported in the 2018 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports. Due to differences in reporting and accounting practices, figures may not match aggregate numbers produced by the state or cover the same 12-month period as the federal data. The number of certified agencies was computed using the approved Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification requests submitted by police, sheriff, and other local law enforcement agencies. The percentage of certified agencies was computed using that number and the total number of agencies reported in the 2018 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies.

Legal Sources

Standard of proof: Weak conviction provision does not require conviction of an owner, but only of “a person.” The provision does not apply if the person agrees with prosecutors to avoid criminal charges in exchange for forfeiture of the property. After the conviction provision is satisfied, property must be linked to the crime by clear and convincing evidence.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, §§ 4243(a), (c), 4244(e).

Innocent owner burden: Owner.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4244(d).

Financial incentive: 45%.

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4247(b)(1).

Process: Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, §§ 4241 et seq. (forfeiture procedure); Vt. R. Civ. P. 55 (default judgment).