Alabama
Alabama earns a D- for its civil forfeiture laws:
Standard of Proof
Low bar to forfeit: Prosecutors must prove by “reasonable satisfaction,” a standard akin to preponderance of the evidence, that property is connected to a crime.
Innocent Owner Burden
Limited protections for the innocent: Third-party owners must prove their own innocence to recover seized property, unless real property is at stake.
Financial Incentive
Large profit incentive: 100% of forfeiture proceeds go to law enforcement.
Recent Reforms
- (2019) SB 191: Adopted new transparency requirements.
Recommendations
- End civil forfeiture
- Direct all forfeiture proceeds to a non-law enforcement fund
- Strengthen protections for innocent third-party owners
- Close the equitable sharing loophole
- Strengthen transparency and accountability requirements
State and Federal Forfeiture Revenues, 2000–2019
Between 2000 and 2019, Alabama law enforcement agencies generated more than $104 million in forfeiture revenue from federal equitable sharing. Alabama ranks 36th for its participation in the Department of Justice’s equitable sharing program. The state does not prevent state and local agencies from using equitable sharing to circumvent state forfeiture law.
At least $104 million in federal forfeiture revenue
2000–2019
| Year | Alabama Forfeiture Revenues | Dept. of Justice Equitable Sharing Proceeds | Treasury Equitable Sharing Proceeds | Total Equitable Sharing Proceeds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Unknown | $1,898,205 | $250,000 | $2,148,205 | |
| 2001 | Unknown | $2,602,074 | $123,000 | $2,725,074 | |
| 2002 | Unknown | $1,968,319 | $269,000 | $2,237,319 | |
| 2003 | Unknown | $4,216,595 | $764,000 | $4,980,595 | |
| 2004 | Unknown | $6,628,648 | $91,000 | $6,719,648 | |
| 2005 | Unknown | $4,866,686 | $373,000 | $5,239,686 | |
| 2006 | Unknown | $5,314,799 | $4,000 | $5,318,799 | |
| 2007 | Unknown | $8,563,174 | $185,000 | $8,748,174 | |
| 2008 | Unknown | $6,500,693 | $19,000 | $6,519,693 | |
| 2009 | Unknown | $8,321,217 | $295,000 | $8,616,217 | |
| 2010 | Unknown | $8,236,687 | $1,816,000 | $10,052,687 | |
| 2011 | Unknown | $4,608,034 | $950,000 | $5,558,034 | |
| 2012 | Unknown | $8,429,272 | $216,000 | $8,645,272 | |
| 2013 | Unknown | $1,880,420 | $252,000 | $2,132,420 | |
| 2014 | Unknown | $5,095,019 | $993,000 | $6,088,019 | |
| 2015 | Unknown | $3,091,009 | $1,876,000 | $4,967,009 | |
| 2016 | Unknown | $2,338,392 | $724,000 | $3,062,392 | |
| 2017 | Unknown | $1,980,089 | $490,000 | $2,470,089 | |
| 2018 | Unknown | $4,951,811 | $253,000 | $5,204,811 | |
| 2019 | Unknown | $2,034,629 | $753,000 | $2,787,629 | |
| Totals | $0 | $93,525,772 | $10,696,000 | $104,221,772 |
All revenue figures include both civil and criminal forfeitures. Revenues are not adjusted for inflation.
Alabama's Forfeiture Transparency and Accountability Report Card
Tracking Seized Property
B
Accounting for Forfeiture Fund Spending
F
Statewide Forfeiture Reports
C
Accessibility of Forfeiture Records
A
Penalties for Failure to File a Report
F
Financial Audits of Forfeiture Accounts
F
At the time of publication, statewide reports required by the 2019 reform were not yet available and were therefore not graded in the print report. The online grades are based on reporting statutes and are subject to change as new information becomes available. Accordingly, they may not match the print report.
For full transparency and accountability grades, visit www.ij.org/TransparencyReportCards.
For full transparency and accountability grades, visit www.ij.org/TransparencyReportCards.
Forfeitures Under Alabama Law: Key Facts
Median Value
UNKNOWNAlabama does not report property-level data necessary to calculate median forfeiture value.
Property Types
UNKNOWNAlabama does not report the types of property forfeited.
Civil vs. Criminal
Alabama does not report whether forfeitures are processed under civil or criminal forfeiture law.
Expenditures
Alabama does not report how forfeiture funds are spent.
Data Notes and Legal Sources
Data Notes
No statewide records available. Alabama had no reporting requirements before the reporting law enacted in 2019. Forfeiture data from the reporting system operated by the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency are expected in 2021 from the Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center Commission. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports.
Legal Sources
Standard of proof: Reasonable satisfaction, a standard akin to preponderance of the evidence.
Ex parte McConathy, 911 So. 2d 677, 681, 687–88 (Ala. 2005) (overturning forfeiture on grounds that mere suspicion that property was involved in a crime does not meet the “reasonable satisfaction” standard) (citations omitted); see also Alabama Evidence § 3:29 (3rd ed., 2019 update) (explaining that “reasonable satisfaction” is equivalent to the preponderance standard).
Innocent owner burden: Depends on the property. Generally, the owner bears the burden of proof. But for real property, the government bears the burden.
Ala. Code § 20-2-93(h).
Financial incentive: 100%.
Ala. Code § 20-2-93(e).
