New York
Policing for Profit
New York earns a C for its civil forfeiture laws.
Somewhat higher bar to forfeit: In drug cases, prosecutors must provide clear and convincing evidence that a crime occurred and then prove seized property’s connection to that crime by preponderance of the evidence. A very weak conviction provision applies in non-drug cases.
Stronger protections for the innocent: The government must prove third-party owners knew about criminal activity connected to their property.
Large profit incentive: 60% of forfeiture proceeds go to law enforcement.
The letter grade reflects the state’s forfeiture laws as of December 2020. When we become aware of relevant reforms, we are updating the standard of proof, innocent owner burden and financial incentive language above, but we are not updating the letter grade.
Recent Reforms
- (2018) FY 2020 State Budget: Strengthened transparency requirements.
Recommendations
- End civil forfeiture
- Direct all forfeiture proceeds to a non-law enforcement fund
- Close the equitable sharing loophole
- Strengthen transparency and accountability requirements
State and Federal Forfeiture Revenues, 2000-2019
Between 2000 and 2018, New York law enforcement agencies forfeited more than $18.2 billion under state law. Between 2000 and 2019, they generated an additional $1.4 billion from federal equitable sharing, for a total of at least $19.7 billion in forfeiture revenue. New York ranks 50th for its participation in the Department of Justice’s equitable sharing program. The state does not prevent state and local agencies from using equitable sharing to circumvent state forfeiture law.
At least $19.7 billion in state and federal forfeiture revenue
2000–2019
| Year | New York Forfeiture Revenues | Dept. of Justice Equitable Sharing Proceeds | Treasury Equitable Sharing Proceeds |
$0 ↦
$9,116,054,910
|
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | $14,084,732 | $31,690,678 | $27,453,000 | $73,228,410 | |
| 2001 | $5,269,566 | $19,256,431 | $22,266,000 | $46,791,997 | |
| 2002 | $12,658,313 | $26,982,890 | $8,427,000 | $48,068,203 | |
| 2003 | $13,739,652 | $19,423,843 | $9,466,000 | $42,629,495 | |
| 2004 | $14,543,954 | $21,847,333 | $9,854,000 | $46,245,287 | |
| 2005 | $15,760,196 | $27,704,134 | $15,303,000 | $58,767,330 | |
| 2006 | $20,033,935 | $16,613,808 | $9,605,000 | $46,252,743 | |
| 2007 | $75,145,172 | $34,612,069 | $9,064,000 | $118,821,241 | |
| 2008 | $17,901,070 | $39,370,757 | $8,613,000 | $65,884,827 | |
| 2009 | $21,950,339 | $42,043,421 | $11,959,000 | $75,952,760 | |
| 2010 | $13,714,789 | $26,442,564 | $16,598,000 | $56,755,353 | |
| 2011 | $49,983,521 | $47,349,380 | $12,863,000 | $110,195,901 | |
| 2012 | $16,928,315 | $31,996,429 | $28,437,000 | $77,361,744 | |
| 2013 | $46,817,727 | $232,658,540 | $11,192,000 | $290,668,267 | |
| 2014 | $8,899,612,843 | $76,140,067 | $140,302,000 | $9,116,054,910 | |
| 2015 | $8,873,908,220 | $152,442,031 | $47,833,000 | $9,074,183,251 | |
| 2016 | $28,449,704 | $28,115,110 | $83,846,000 | $140,410,814 | |
| 2017 | $43,410,169 | $30,794,069 | $17,101,000 | $91,305,238 | |
| 2018 | $30,170,873 | $34,877,257 | $27,368,000 | $92,416,130 | |
| 2019 | Unavailable | $26,451,664 | $16,275,000 | $42,726,664 | |
| Totals | $18,214,083,090 | $966,812,475 | $533,825,000 |
State
Department of Justice
Treasury
|
$19,714,720,565 |
New York Forfeiture Transparency and Accountability Report Card
| C | Tracking Seized Property |
|---|---|
| D | Accounting for Forfeiture Fund Spending |
| B | Statewide Forfeiture Reports |
| B | Accessibility of Forfeiture Records |
|---|---|
| F | Penalties for Failure to File a Report |
| C | Financial Audits of Forfeiture Accounts |
Forfeitures Under New York Law: Key Facts
Median Value
UnknownNew York does not report property-level data necessary to calculate median forfeiture value.
Property Types
UnknownNew York does not report the types of property forfeited.
Civil vs. Criminal
UnknownNew York does not report whether forfeitures are processed under civil or criminal forfeiture law.
Expenditures
UnknownNew York does not report how most forfeiture funds are spent.
Data Notes
Calendar-year figures are from reports on the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services website. Generally, figures purport to represent the value of assets forfeited. Those for 2011 represent only money forfeited. Figures for 2012 through 2018 include the value of retained vehicles and other forfeited property. Spikes in 2014 and 2015 are attributed to New York County’s reported total forfeited assets. Case-level data obtained via public records request to CJS could not be used for further analysis. Equitable sharing data are from DOJ’s and Treasury’s annual forfeiture reports. Due to differences in reporting and accounting practices, state figures may not match aggregate numbers produced by the state or cover the same 12-month period as the federal data.
Legal Sources
Standard of proof: In drug cases, prosecutors must provide clear and convincing evidence that a crime occurred and then link the property to that crime by a preponderance of the evidence. Very weak conviction provision applies in non-drug cases.
N.Y. C.P.L.R. §§ 1310(5)–(6), (9)–(10), 1311(3)(a)–(b); Hendley v. Clark, 543 N.Y.S.2d 554, 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989).
Innocent owner burden: Government.
N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1311(3).
Financial incentive: 60%.
N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1349(2)(g)–(h).