South Dakota

Grades
Forfeiture
Law Grade
State Law Evasion Grade  Final
Grade
South Dakota

 

Forfeiture Law
South Dakota does little to protect its citizens from civil forfeiture abuse, as its poor law grade of D- shows.  The state’s final grade of C reflects limited use of equitable sharing to date.  To forfeit real property, the government must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence, but for all other property, the government only needs to show probable cause.  These are low standards, far below what is needed to establish criminal guilt.  For an innocent owner claim, the property owner is forced to bear the burden of proof, effectively presuming owners are guilty.  And law enforcement has access to 100 percent of the money it brings in from civil forfeiture.  Initially, the assets are distributed to a “drug control fund” managed by the Attorney General, but law enforcement can then request that money for its own use.  There is no requirement that law enforcement collect or report information on the use of forfeiture or its proceeds.

Forfeitures as Reported to LEMAS (Drug-related only)

 

Total Assets
Forfeited

Assets Forfeited per
Law Enforcement Agency

1993

$163,568

$8,616

1997

$2,563,089

$12,087

2000

$307,682

$1,802

2003

$1,114,539

$5,476

 

Equitable Sharing Proceeds from the Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF)

 

Proceeds Returned to State

FY 2000

$9,583

FY 2001

$105,550

FY 2002

$53,130

FY 2003

$122,365

FY 2004

$22,928

FY 2005

$48,750

FY 2006

$36,143

FY 2007

$42,765

FY 2008

$6,784

Total

$447,998

Average per Year

$49,778

 

Freedom of Information Data
No Data Available; Not Required to Collect

Learn how states were graded and how data was collected

Return to Policing for Profit main page